User talk:JFO-SEO
April 2014[edit]
Your addition to Diclofenac has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Copy-paste from http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/news/vulture-killing-drug-now-available-eu-market © 2014 BirdLife International Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- THIS IS NOT A COPYRIGHT VIOLATION. If you had read the text, you could have seen that just a phrase was copyed, but I contributed to the original text. My organisation belongs to the federation owing the original text. AND you erased more text that the simply copy-paste. Please, respect this time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JFO-SEO (talk • contribs) 08:53, 25 April 2014
- Yes, it is a copyright violation. It doesn't matter if you wrote the original text, or if your organization owns the copyright, or if you have the right to reproduce it. Wikipedia does not have permission to reproduce it, and some random user account like yours has zero standing to claim that authority.
- YOU need to respect the policies and guidelines here, and you aren't doing that. Namely:
- Wikipedia is not your publicity channel
- Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (see message below), which says that you should NOT be making substantive changes to content in articles on subjects where you have a conflict of interest
- Wikipedia:Username policy, which prohibits role accounts, accounts operated by corporations, and accounts accessible by multiple people. You edit here as your own personal self, an individual, or not at all
- WP:COPYVIO, which says we don't publish content already published elsewhere.
- On the basis of the above, I am blocking this account. See the block message at the bottom of this page for further instructions. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- YOU need to respect the policies and guidelines here, and you aren't doing that. Namely:
Conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, JFO-SEO. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Diclofenac, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Please, cna you have a look to what I wrote instead of blocking me or deleting the content? Las time you have deleted one full paragraph because I copied one line. Please, respect the contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.54.22.181 (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
JFO-SEO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This username belongs to me, just to me, and I'm the only person that can have access to it
Decline reason:
However, it's still a violation of the username policy. What you need to do is request a change of username as described above. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.