User talk:JKRichard

Welcome[edit]

Hello JKRichard and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your work on Vincentian election articles; if you're interested in elections, we have a "WikiProject" focussing on election articles, which you can view or join at WP:E&R. Just a couple of tips for you:

The winners of the election shouldn't be bolded in the election infobox.
The % in the previous election should be the vote % not the seat %

If you have any questions, I'm happy to try and help answer them. Cheers, Number 5 7 23:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The UK elections shouldn't have the bolding either, but unfortunately sometimes there can be resistance to attempts to make Wikipedia consistent. Number 5 7 23:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Mr X 🖋 13:38, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1RR[edit]

Just so you're aware, the article Brett Kavanaugh is under some special editing restrictions (detailed at the top of the the talk page) including a WP:1RR restriction, which it looks like you've run afoul of [1] [2]. Please familiarize yourself with these restrictions. Also we expect editors to interact collaboratively and assume good faith, which it doesn't look like you did in this edit summary. ~Awilley (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinions/contributions would be much appreciated on the Talk:Rent_regulation page[edit]

Hello! There is currently a discussion and question posed on the Talk:Rent_regulation#Notified_WikiProjects page asking whether there is any single body which speaks for the economics profession as a whole.

You seem like someone with the type of knowledge who could be a CONTINUOUSLY valuable contributor to the discussion, and article.

If you have the time, please contribute, and maybe that way we can get the Rent regulation article's quality up to something an economist would think is respectable, and reflects the knowledge of the field.

Any help you can give would be much appreciated!!! Thanks!! ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 00:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maps[edit]

Hello again. Thanks for your new maps of the Vincentian elections. Just one slight issue - the colour you're using for constituencies that voted heavily for the NDP (black) doesn't really fit with the colour scheme. When I saw the map I thought it was an error as I assumed that the darkest colour on the map represented the ULP (as red is usually darker than yellow). Is there any chance you could rejig the colours so that the darkest NDP colour is still recognisably yellow? Cheers, Number 5 7 22:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: Sure. I'm personally not satisfied with the colour scheme myself. The source of the yellow scale was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election#/media/File:Gary_Johnson_strength_map_by_county,_2016.svg. I'll continue to work on them.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St. Vincent Grammar School[edit]

The article St. Vincent Grammar School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable secondary sources in its 9.69-year history; no evidence of meeting the notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 00:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]