User talk:Jack1234567891011121314151617

August 2017[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alt-Right, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. You have to wait for a consensus, not just silence, before blanking a section like that. Mooeena ● 💌 ● 🖋️ 21:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:19, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Make this edit again without getting consensus on the talk page and I will block you. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN That's not post-1932 politics of the United States tho Jack1234567891011121314151617 (talk) 19:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read the notices at the top of the article's talk page. Alt-right fits squarely into that topic. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources do not need to be in the lead if they are in the body of the article[edit]

See WP:LEAD. I've reverted your edit of the GAB article. Doug Weller talk 19:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]