User talk:Jackmcbarn/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Political television series. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Wales - revert

Soz. Touchscreen. Ian Dalziel (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

why you deleted transformers image from my page ???

This media is on transformers page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformers Can I show it on my personal page ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexFurman (talkcontribs) 05:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC) Nevermind, it can be used only for article , I get it. (AlexFurman (talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 05:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

10:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Pending changes 2014 RfC Proposal 12

Information icon Hello! As a result of discussion with other editors regarding Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014, I have made a slight change to Proposal 12 to remove the so-called "exclusivity clause". For the change, see this diff. I am posting this notice on your talk page because you have already inserted comments on the original proposal, and I want to make sure you are aware of the change so that you may revise your comments if you wish to do so.

I apologize for the confusion. If you wish, you may slap me. Ivanvector (talk) 03:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Richard Branson

Hi Jackmcbarn, Thanks for your message. Please are you able to explain why adding Makepeace Island to Richard Branon's business ventures is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia. It is factual and whilst I am still learning the correct referencing, Makepeace Island is owned by Sir Richard and it is his Australian home. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makepeace Island (talkcontribs) 03:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Mammoth

Concerning [22] and [23], see also User talk:Favonian#Mammoth ip seems to be back. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Tossh_eng

Hi Jackmcbarn, Thanks for your message saying that "Why did you turn on feedback on Wikipedia:General disclaimer?" However, I did never enter in that page and never edit the content. In the view history, the sign, Tossh_eng is left, but it's not me. I suspects that somebody else has used my sign. Considering the situation, I changed the password to sign in. I hope such identity thief will not occur again with me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tossh eng (talkcontribs) 04:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

I don't think you got hacked. I think you clicked "Enable feedback" without realizing it. In any case, I've re-disabled feedback, so no harm done. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

JimMunchbach

Hi Jackmcbarn,

Jim Munchbach here. Lots to learn here on Wikipedia. I'm a newbie and I was just trying to set up a user page (which seemed like a reasonable place to begin the process of learning Wikipedia).

So, should I update my page before it gets deleted? Or, should I let it be deleted, do my research and prepare the content I want to post on Wikipedia, and then come back and post a new user page when I'm ready to post the content?

I'm looking for a training resource in Kindle now. Wiki for Dummies sounds like a good title...

Thanks Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimMunchbach (talkcontribs) 13:15, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

It sounds like you have a conflict of interest. You really shouldn't write about yourself or things you're affiliated with. See also WP:PSCOI. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

kamley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamley already have two web links present there for an article.Please let me know why this article is being removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vish.mystic (talkcontribs) 19:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

If you feel an article should be kept, explain why on its deletion discussion page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

09:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

About the article decline.

Hello Jackmcbarn,

I have submitted an article regarding the Lovin'Com and I would like to thank you for the advice provided. I have editted the article (having removed the mission and vision of the company since they might sound advertising) and would like to know what else can I do considering the priority of the question.

Thank you in regard,

Best — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovin'com (talkcontribs) 11:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

First, I advise you to change your username, as a company name as a username is a violation of username policy and may cause you to be blocked. Also, since you have a COI, it's recommended that you not try to write the article about your own company (see WP:PSCOI for more about this). If you insist on doing so anyway, you must make sure to use reliable and independent sources in the article. Once you've made these improvements, resubmit it and it will be reviewed again. Jackmcbarn (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

About an edit summary

Hi there. Re your edit summary here, what you were reverting was simply unsourced content, not unsourced negative content. Even in the la-la land of pending changes, the distinction is worth making. Rivertorch (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

That was a borderline case. (We do have a filter that tries to mark edits like that as libel/vandalism). But point taken. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Well, libel and vandalism seem like two rather different things; either might be a subset of the other or it might not, depending on the context. That article and a related one, now semi'd indefinitely, both suffer from these sorts of edits. I'd certainly call them vandalism, since they seem like deliberate attempts to sabotage the verifiability of the articles, but I don't suppose they're libelous. Anyway, thanks for the quick response. Rivertorch (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

08:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Re: Which API call(s) can be used to check for redlink status?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kobre & Kim LLP (February 9)

 – Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

09:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your watchful patrolling eye. Have a brownie! N4 (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Can you please not delete my "Bubzbeauty" page! It has references to articles and proper citations. Also she is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page as she is one of the most subscribed YouTube personalities from the United Kingdom!This page should not be deleted!!! She has been interviewed by multiple online magazines and is notable enough to be on Wikipedia! The page also has proper sources and refrences! Please do not delete!

That last message was from me. Kewtea (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Accept Revision bug

FYI: Accept Revision bug happening now at Huntington's disease and Disaster. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. The entry that shows ClueBot reviewed the page is there, so presumably some views are just out of date. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

08:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Asma al-Assad

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Asma al-Assad. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

10:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion

Please stop prodding basketball articles right after I removed the tag and added sources. If you really believe the articles are not notable, take it to AfD. I, as an uninvolved editor, have contested the decision, so therefore it doesn't need to be added again. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 03:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that; I didn't realize they'd been PROD'd before. I'll take them to AfD. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Actually, upon looking closer, it appears you're confusing PROD and BLPPROD. Except for the names, they're entirely separate deletion processes. It seems you've only removed BLPPROD's, whereas I've added PROD's. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
So far all of the players you've PRODded at all either meet GNG or are close enough you should go the AfD route anyway. Rikster2 (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
What's the harm in PROD'ing borderline articles? If they get contested, I can AfD anyway, and if not, it saves bureaucracy. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Are you doing any sort of search to determine if they meet GNG? I'd argue AfD is much more likely to result in a fully fleshed out article for someone who is actually notable. Which feels like it's more in the spirit of the encyclopedia. Rikster2 (talk) 18:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
For the articles currently in question, I didn't, because nothing in the articles seemed to indicate a claim of notability. When I'm looking at articles that do somehow claim notability, I take more care in checking for sources. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough, you didn't do anything wrong, just more of a philosophy thing. I've reached out to the editor who created these articles to see if I can help him put a better product out there. Rikster2 (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
No problem with good faith PRODs. However, I ask you to reconsider opening AFDs like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Babb after the PROD was contested on the grounds of WP:GNG and additional sources were added to the article. Opening that AfD with the same PROD reason, failing WP:NBASKETBALL, disregards that WP:GNG can be met by a player even though they may not satisfy WP:NBASKETBALL. Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Chris Babb still looks rather borderline to me. Only one of the AfD's I filed for these got any keep !votes, and I withdrew that one. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
At least for cases where GNG is claimed (as it was when I contested the PROD), it would be helpful if the deletion rationale explained why GNG was not met. WP:NSPORTS does say that "Failing to meet the criteria in this guideline means that notability will need to be established in other ways (e.g. the general notability guideline ..."—Bagumba (talk) 20:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Okay. I'll make sure to clarify that in future nominations. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Yeah, in my experience there is a larger group of editors that check out AfDs than prods. The articles as created probably did not pass the notability guidelines, but they do now, thanks to editor who came across it at AfD. Also, I have voted for keep on several of the AfDs, so its not as if they are completely not notable. Chris Babb may be a little iffy, but he was a solid contributor on an NCAA tournament team a year ago. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 21:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • I have no doubt you are trying to improve things. Also consider in the future WP:ATD-T, i.e. tagging the article with {{notability}} if you are not sure if fails GNG.—Bagumba (talk) 21:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Chris Babb

I was just wondering, as you closed the E. J. Singler deletion debate, would you be able to do the same for Chris Babb [104] ? DaHuzyBru (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

I can't, since another user !voted delete. Jackmcbarn (talk) 13:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

The Act of Murder

OK, unprotected. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jackmcbarn:

WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

09:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Revision of Article on Jesus

The article on Jesus, section entitled "Crucifixion and burial," currently states: "In Matthew 27:62–66, on the following day the Jews ask Pilate for the tomb to be sealed with a stone and placed under guard to ensure the body will remain there." This sentence is completely erroneous. Gospel Matthew 27:60 clearly states that Joseph of Arimethea was responsible for placing the large stone over the entrance to the tomb after the body of Jesus had been prepared.

Matthew27: [60] And laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn out in the rock: and he rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed.

The offending sentence under the section entitled "Crucifixion and burial," should be rewritten: "In Matthew 27:62–66, on the following day the chief Jewish priests ask Pilate for the tomb to be secured, and with Pilate's permission the priests place seals on the entrance stone and set a guard."

This serves to bring the statement into conformity with Matthew 27:65–66, which reads:

"[65] Pilate said unto them, Ye have a watch: go your way, make it as sure as ye can. [66] So they went, and made the sepulchre sure, sealing the stone, and setting a watch."

Jasfay 03/03/14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasfay (talkcontribs) 23:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

If you want to request an edit be made to the article on Jesus, post it at Talk:Jesus. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

68.41.77.159

you seem to have reported a comment that i made on terrorists when what I said was not racist at all I said " the Taliban is all Muslim." that is not racist at all in fact it is true not all Muslims are terrorist but most terrorists are Muslim I have a boy that came home two years ago and his squad automatic firer had his spine pierced by shrapnel and now he is a paraplegic so I unfortunately carry some dislike for terrorists but I am Catholic and I am not a racist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.77.159 (talk) 00:53, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

I have no idea what your comment was exactly. In any case, the system you submitted the comment with has been removed, so there's no use discussing it further. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Article decline & speedy deletion.

Hello, Jackmcbarn. You have new messages at Jpgovekar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jpgovekar (talk) 02:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Abbreviation field on Template:Infobox_university

Although I am a Wikipedia enthusiast, the policies here still confuse me so much that I end up avoiding complex editions. I have been flirting for a while, however, with the idea of adding an "abbreviation" field to university infoboxes. I have left a message on the talk page for the infobox template but I've got no reply so far. I am contacting you because you were the last person to edit the infobox university page and you seem rather involved. Do you think it's a valid edition? Should I raise the question anywhere else before editing it myself? Thank you, Ariel Pontes (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Go ahead and submit the edit request (the page is protected). Jackmcbarn (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

New redirects

You'll recall this discussion when you enabled the software to tag redirects that are left behind when a page is renamed with {{R from move}}. Hypothetical: If there were a Category:Newly created redirects and an rcat named {{R newly created}}, which would populate the category, then is it possible for the software to tag a redirect soon or immediately after it is first created? If so, then the category could be monitored to ensure that newly created redirects are correctly categorized. Is this possible? – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 18:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes, but I'd want a method to automatically uncategorize them once they're not new anymore first. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
It would have to be monitored on an equable basis, and yet, I do understand your concern. The category would be like the other redirect maintenance cats, and I would monitor it. Also, it occurs to me that there already exists a Category:Miscellaneous redirects that is populated by the bare (no rcats added) {{This is a redirect}} template. Perhaps that cat and template could be used for this purpose? I would definitely monitor that category to keep it clear. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 20:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Another issue I just thought of is that this would make it impossible for non-admins to revert any moves once they're no longer new. What would the purpose of this category be, anyway? Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Every redirect I've come across that the {{R from move}} has auto-tagged has needed at least one other rcat, so those moves can now only be reverted by admins. New redirects left behind by moves is one segment of all newly created redirects. This category will be useful to monitor all newly created redirects and to sort them when necessary. The new redirects will be removed from the miscellaneous category after at least one rcat is added to the This is a redirect template. The miscellaneous cat is presently very sparsely used by some editors who are not sure what rcats and cats to use. They tag the redirect with the bare This is a redirect template so a monitor will come by and finish the sorts. When we implement this new procedure, the category will continue with the small purpose of usefulness to unsure editors and also have the larger purpose of maintenance of newly formed redirects. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 20:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
I really don't see how that's useful. If you get consensus for it on a village pump, I'll set it up, though. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Okay, thank you! For now, it's good to know that it's doable. I'll see what I can put together for the pump. Joys! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 05:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

09:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Request for speedy deletion of module

Can an admin delete Module:Location map/data as G7? (CSD tags don't work on module pages). I know it appears to have 50000 transclusions, but these are not "real" and appear only because the job queue is behind. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Try the talk page and request it from there. ///EuroCarGT 16:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 Done. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Module:Location map

If neither Module:Location_map/data/... nor Template:Location_map_... exists, the following error is raised:

expandTemplate: template "Location map UK Scotland" does not exist
Backtrace:

[C]: in function "expandTemplate"
mw.lua:411: in function "expandTemplate"
Module:Location_map:29: in function "map"
Module:Location_map:110: in function "top"
Module:Location_map:150: in function "chunk"
mw.lua:558: ?
[C]: in function "expandTemplate"
mw.lua:411: in function "expandTemplate"
Module:Documentation:640: in function "_content"
Module:Documentation:141: ?
(tail call): ?
mw.lua:558: ?

(Note: this happens in thwiki, not enwiki)

In my opinion, we should make a tracking category for non-existing templates, but we should not let the script throw the error like this. --Nullzero (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

If neither the module nor the template exists, then it wasn't called properly (and it would have made an ugly mess in the old non-Lua version of the template). What do you want to happen in that case exactly? Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
My idea is that if it is possible, we should catch errors as many as possible and categorize pages containing those errors, so people can precisely fix them. For example, if Module:Citation/CS1 didn't catch errors, we would see a lot of pages in Category:Pages_with_script_errors, but people would not be able to figure it out easily what problem it is. With Category:CS1_errors:_dates, we can see that pages falling in this category are missing parameter "date." In the same way, if neither the module nor the template exists, it would be nice to have a tracking category for this case.
It is true that this case means the module wasn't called properly, and the goal for doing tracking category is to fix it. Also, since we switched to lua version already, why do we have to care about the old version? --Nullzero (talk) 20:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
We don't care about the old version. I was just saying I didn't make the problem any worse. Anyway, rather than making a new category to fix that, I think looking for redlinked transcluded templates would be a better fix. Does thwiki run database reports for those? Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Also, when you click on the words "Script error", it tells you the problem: Lua error: expandTemplate: template "Location map whatever" does not exist. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry that I didn't make it clear. I didn't say that you did something wrong. Rather, I just suggested for an improvement. Since lua can handle errors very easy, compared to using only template and parser functions, it would be nice to do all I mentioned above. Anyway, I don't have any difficulty from fixing those script errors in Thai Wikipedia because there are very few errors. So, if you think that this module is fine enough, it's fine. Thank you anyway :) --Nullzero (talk) 02:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
I've just updated the module to improve the error messages it generates. Is this a good solution? Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Yep. It is better than only showing "script error" without any reason. Thank you very much :) --Nullzero (talk) 22:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Technical move of Alaska templates -- two errors

Hello Jack. Can you tell why I would get these errors on doing the move:

The page Template:Location map USA Alaska/sandbox could not be moved to Module:Location map/data/USA Alaska/attribution/sandbox.
The page Template:Location map USA Alaska/testcases could not be moved to Module:Location map/data/USA Alaska/attribution/testcases.

Any suggestions of what to do next are welcome. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:48, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

I don't need the subpages moved. (In fact, I'm going to tag them for CSD G8 after the move). Just don't worry about them. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:53, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Rationale for removing Lua from Template:Incomplete/doc

I would like to understand why {{Lua}} was removed from the documentation. The first line of {{Incomplete}} contains

#invoke:Unsubst

which does invoke Lua. However, that was a wrapper around the body of the template that was not converted to Lua. Is that why? How can one tell which invocation is spurious and which is not? Does the entire template have to invoke a complete Lua substitute? Just curious?

PS. I'm fairly new at discussions and didn't know whether to post this general question here or on the template's talk page. Dpleibovitz (talk) 23:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Basically, the template needs to be nothing but Lua for the {{lua}} tag to be eligible. Template:Infobox and Template:Edit protected are two good examples. If a template happens to use some Lua, but is mostly other stuff, it doesn't need the {{lua}} tag. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt reply Dpleibovitz (talk) 23:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

07:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

User talk:77.251.154.154

Thanks for the notification. GiantSnowman 18:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of countries by average wage. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

List of PlayStation 3 games

see this request. 174.56.57.138 (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)