Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kelly Clarkson discography, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mika discography, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Freshpop (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Rihanna, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article James Antoniou has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Stylized formatting is not used in article titles. Please do not move, change, or undo redirects in order to change things to "Ke$ha". - eo (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Request for use of Preview, edit summaries, minor edits flag[edit]
Hi, Jagoperson
I have seen you work on the Rihanna discography article and it's nice to have you working on the project. I've noticed you tend to do a series of edits, sometimes just to move a table or two, and I'd like to suggest you make use of a few of the features offered by WP, which could help you get along better with other editors here. Here's my little list:
Please use the "Show preview" button to check your work so far, before you commit the change with "Save page" (the buttons are right next to each other). This lets you check what you're doing, enables you to see if you've messed up a table (all too easy to do), and helps remind you what you've forgotten. When you want to reposition a table, for example, you don't have to (1) delete it, (2) Save page, (3) insert it, and (4) Save page. You can just cut, paste, preview, and then go on to Save page or keep making other changes before saving.
Please use the edit summaries. Providing a summary gives the rest of an idea of what you're doing, why you're doing it, or where you got the info. The edit summary field is just above the "Save page" and "Show preview" buttons. When you're not always saving halfway through the procedure, you can include an edit summary like "Moved Charity singles to be *before* Single certifications, where it makes more sense", or similar. Then everyone knows what you're up to, and it doesn't look like you're some vandal blanking or dumping whole chunks of info.
Please mark minor edits as minor. Changing the width of a column (and adjusting it back because you forgot to Preview), changing formatting of text or deleting a duplicated word are all minor edits which not everyone wants to see in their Watchlist or in the article's Revision history. All you have to do is click to place a check in the checkbox labeled "This is a minor edit".
Please try these features out and keep up your good work. Thanks! — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Rated R Tour, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Adambro (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Rihanna 2006 Tour, Rihanna Believe Tour. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rated R Tour. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rated R Tour. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can I ask you why you keep removing the German peak chart positions from the singles table? Paloma has charted there, the positions are referenced and the German charts are not included in WP:BADCHARTS. - JuneGloom07Talk? 11:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rihanna discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - eo (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IT IS NOTABLE BECUASE SHE IS AN UPCOMING SINGER/DANCER! :P Jagoperson (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What is this all about?!!? I only have one account! :P Do you hate me or something? I am really enjoying my time on Wikipedia so please do not do this to me!Jagoperson (talk) 07:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Asking a "friend" to comment on the same discussions as you is meatpuppetry, and even if there are two people, you'll probably still be treated as one. anemoneprojectorstalk 10:54, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Really? I am sorry then. I will not do it again, but I didn't realise it was against the Wikipedia rules.Jagoperson (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for agreeing to not do this again. You may want to brush up on WP:MEAT and WP:SOCK. Best, NW(Talk) 01:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Rockstar 101, to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Last Girl on Earth Tour, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Any information sourced from a non-credible site (according to Wikipedia's guidelines) will be quickly removedItsbydesign (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just applied the second half of the fix I think you were trying to effect to the footnotes for the Big Weekend show in the Last Girl on Earth Tour article. It would have been easier if you had explained what you were trying to achieve with your related edit. Some of what you do looks like vandalism, because you don't explain your intentions. Please use an edit summary with every revision.
Also, I notice that you have a tendency to make several small edits all in a row, so as to achieve some slightly larger goal. For example, yesterday you made a string of 14 edits in 25 minutes to the Last Girl on Earth Tour page (with only one edit summary), and the end results didn't require that many edits. For example, in one edit (the one with the edit summary), you deleted the "Tour incident" section. In the next edit, you pasted it back in somewhere else. You could have done this all in one edit, and checked your work, and then used the edit summary to tell us why you were moving it, and then saved. Also, your numerous edits to add, size, resize, position, and reposition one image could have been done all in one shot, with you saving only what you were happy with at the end. My tip (and request): please make use of the Show preview function before you save. (The preview helps you check your edit summary, too.
I hope this helps you be even more constructive here. Good luck! — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just saw that you posted on your userpage that you need help citing sources. It can be quite complicated, so have a look at Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners with citation templates, which is a short beginner's guide. There are other helpful links at the bottom of that page, but you could and up with a lot to read. I also also recommend using the gadget called RefToolbar (I use it all the time). Remember, if you ever need help in future, you can add the template {{helpme}} to your talk page and someone should come along to help (remember to put your question below the template before you save the page). AnemoneProjectors 20:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also notice that since joining a few months ago, you've never been properly welcomed, so here goes.
Welcome!
Hello, Jagoperson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! AnemoneProjectors 20:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ever so much! I will read all of it because it seems complicated and whenever I add a ref it always gets taken off so this helps a lot =] x Jagoperson (talk) 20:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I usually find the best way is to see how other people do it. Initially, I actually learnt very little by reading guidelines on here (because I just didn't!). AnemoneProjectors 20:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. People (including yourself) have been trying to add a section about the critical reception to the Last Girl on Earth Tour article, which is fine and appropriate. Unfortunately, the text that is getting added consists of the wholesale copying of complete reviews from two Web sites. This comprises a clear copyright violation. Please see the Talk page for a fuller explanation of my concerns with this addition, and please stop reverting its removal. Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted your edits because they are not sourced. If you can provide a source for it i'll happy put the set list back.Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speechless (Lady Gaga song), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TbhotchTalkC. 02:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Additional note This is the header for the page: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hi. You might be interested in the discussion here concerning your recent edit to the London article. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Puccino's, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾talk 17:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Hop (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Katy b.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Hi. When you recently edited Sticks and Stones Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UEA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Elephant (song) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Aaron • You Da One 20:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
i noticed you moved the 2013 Arena Tour page to One Direction 2013 Arena Tour, could you move it One Direction Arena Tour instead leave out 2013 because mtv. just published that one direction will be announcing their north american arena tour soon for summer 2012 so it think it's better if 2013 isn't the page title. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paloma Faith, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - JuneGloomTalk 18:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't actually mean to remove the singles section. I just wanted to put a touring section in. Jagoperson (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've striked the warning. An edit summary explaining what you were trying to do/did would have helped though. - JuneGloomTalk 21:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dance Again World Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wizard of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Rihanna's seventh studio album. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Rihanna's seventh studio album. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at This article is in an incubator. – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AARON• TALK 22:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Halcyon Tour. Since you had some involvement with the Halcyon Tour redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 12:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jagoperson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Jagoperson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sticks and Stones Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Hop (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
