User talk:JameiLei

Re: Rose Tyler

• I would recommend doing the same as what I did with Time Lord - after every episode title put an in-line citation to that episodes article on Wikipedia. To see how to do this, and what fields you should put in, look at some of the source for Time Lord. Do the same with the books.

• I would also lose that first bit of trivia in the Trivia section - it's a bit irrelevant.

• The image for Rose needs a fair-use rationale. (Image:Rosetyler2.jpg)

• Some recent contributions need to be copy edited in the Trivia section.

• Change from "Notes" to "References" - including the <div class="small"> bit.

Other from that, its consistent with the other criteria. It's stable, it's relatively broad in its coverage, it complies with the manual of style (read: doesn't look wrong), and its neutral. Just fix those references and that image and you'll be fine. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smomo (talk • contribs) 22:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC).

Thats what had to happen at Time Lord. Go ahead and try it without and see what people say. Smomo 23:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

The Simpsons

Hi, it is good to see some new blood in the Simpsons Wikiproject. I noticed that you have being doing some copyediting and would like to ask you to take a stab at the main article The Simpsons. It is currently under Featured Article Review in which some editors says it contains poor prose. Any assistance would be valued. --Maitch 19:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I think the second half needs even more attention. --Maitch 15:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Btw it is good to know we have a decent copyeditor involved in the project. It is a problem that often arises, when we try to promote the articles. --Maitch 15:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Request

Hey, if you get a spare moment from copy-editing The Simpsons, could you give David Mitchell (actor) a copy-edit? I'm trying to get it GA, and would prefer if the prose was brilliant, and your good at doing that. Thanks. Gran² 15:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, as said, there are no time constraints for the article, so anytime at all really! Gran² 16:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Your back! Mitchell's page got GA a while back, but there are more urgent copy edits afoot. Someone nominated You Only Move Twice for FA, without our knowledge. I think the main problem now is the prose, so if you could, could you take a look? Thanks. Gran² 17:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

innocent smoothies

Please can you direct your attention to the talk page there. Thanks!

The Simpsons WikiProject membership update

The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!

The The Simpsons WikiProject team – 18:12, 28 April 2024 UTC [refresh]

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

	The Space-Time Telegraph
	The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter
	Issue 1	March 2008
Project News We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002. One editor has left the project: StuartDD. The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33. Articles of note New featured articles None New featured article candidates Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who) (FAC) New good articles Dalek (Doctor Who episode) Astrid Peth Delisted articles None Proposals A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here. A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here. A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here. News The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope. The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April. For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC) You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

Invergordon railway station

Please provide a reference for the statement "None of the station buildings are in use at this time". Although the information is useful, it constitutes WP:OR. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The Simpsons Star

With the Simpsons WikiProject having reached it's goal of getting every single article about a season 1-9 episode, 203 in total, of The Simpsons to GA status. With that accomplished, I am trying to thank every member (and non-member) who was involved in the effort in some way.

		The Simpsons (Annoyed Grunt)-star
		WP:DOH has reached its long-time goal of getting every classic era episode, 203 in total, to GA. You earned this because you helped us out at the beginning, with copyediting and other similar contributions. -- Scorpion0422 II (Talk) 23:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Shottingham listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shottingham. Since you had some involvement with the Shottingham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. This is Paul (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JameiLei. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)