User talk:Jamzy4

You can leave a message on my talk page here, or alternatively, you can send me an email

If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page. If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there.


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #20

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jamzy4, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 20:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Proposed deletion of 247 Africa Magazine[edit]

The article 247 Africa Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New magazine, clearly WP:TOOSOON. No independent references, only list of "celebrities featured" referenced to magazine itself (see WP:NOTINHERITED).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randykitty Thanks very much for your concern towards the page, you are right. I think the article will be improve before the giving date.--Jamzy4 (talk) 06:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Jamzy4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 20:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Recent edit to Fela Kuti[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 00:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FenixFeather Good thanks.--Jamzy4 (talk) 06:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Jamie Tubers. An edit that you recently made to West Africa seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jamie Tubers (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Tubers Thanks.--Jamzy4 (talk) 07:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dami Adenuga[edit]

The article Dami Adenuga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real evidence of notability. Being a PR manager isn't a qualifier for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CambridgeBayWeather yes i understand you very well. "Being a PR manager isn't a qualifier for notability". The article will be improve as soon as possible. Can i ask a question on this issue?. Including Notable performance on the article does it meets Notability.

You need references to prove that he is notable. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks CambridgeBayWeather i will do that as possible before the date given.--Jamzy4 (talk) 20:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dami Adenuga for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dami Adenuga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dami Adenuga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 21:41, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion concerning you at ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 03:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, including the nomination of numerous articles for AFD as revenge. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apology for the reaction[edit]

Good day @Citobun:, I am very sorry for the reaction taken by me. I know within one week i will be unblock but i just need to apologies for the reaction taken, I know what i did was wrong by nominating your article for AFD, But you lead me into it, because of the frustration which you accuse on me as a COI editor, moving forward to your edit and then nominated all article written by me for AFD which was wrong according to WP:AFD. It is annoying for someone accusing you of something you know nothing about. I also apologize to @Someguy1221: for the reaction taking. I hope you all forgive me thanks.--Jamzy4 (talk) 11:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing inappropriate about what Citobun did.

I am curious about your Commons submissions. How did you obtain these images? Rebb ing 12:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rebbing: The images where obtained from the internet. While i created one myself which is called "I love Wikipedia" designed by me.--Jamzy4 (talk) 12:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Thank you for your honesty. Unfortunately, uploading other people's images without permission is a serious copyright violation. It's also problematic from a truth standpoint: for each of those images, you claimed that the photograph was your own work. Rebb ing 12:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. That"s where i am having the problem. But don"t really know how to fix this issues, but when it comes to COI. I am definitely not engage with such.--Jamzy4 (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rebbing: But i don"t see any default nominating those article for AFD because their meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.--Jamzy4 (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a matter to be decided at the individual discussions. Looking at some of the articles myself, it's not at all clear they meet either GNG or MUSICBIO. Anyway, we don't say that a nomination is "wrong" merely because some people disagree with it. Citobun's nominations were well within the realm of reasonable possibilities. Rebb ing 13:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamzy4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realized my mistakes and never to engage in revenge again neither to fight for my self without consulting the wikipedia administrators. Jamzy4 (talk) 15:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are now blocked for sockpuppetry, which makes this request obsolete. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2016[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]