User talk:Janstrugnell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelika Brandt has been accepted[edit]

Angelika Brandt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hermera34 (talk) 16:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Bell (scientist) has been accepted[edit]

Robin Bell (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 01:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terry Wilson (Scientist) (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 01:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Janstrugnell, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 01:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Rumble (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 01:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michelle Rogan-Finnemore (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 01:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Farrell has been accepted[edit]

Roberta Farrell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 01:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Truswell (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In-Young Ahn (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 13:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliographies[edit]

Please include a selected bibliography for all academic articles. LaMona (talk) 13:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christina Riesselmann (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barbara Wienecke (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlotta Escutia Dotti (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 16:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doris Abele has been accepted[edit]

Doris Abele, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In-Young Ahn has been accepted[edit]

In-Young Ahn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dana Bergstom has been accepted[edit]

Dana Bergstom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 02:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Buma has been accepted[edit]

Anita Buma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathleen Conlan has been accepted[edit]

Kathleen Conlan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlotta Escutia Dotti has been accepted[edit]

Carlotta Escutia Dotti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kumiko Goto-Azuma has been accepted[edit]

Kumiko Goto-Azuma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kit Kovacs has been accepted[edit]

Kit Kovacs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 01:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hong Kum Lee has been accepted[edit]

Hong Kum Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 01:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Leventer has been accepted[edit]

Amy Leventer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katrin Linse has been accepted[edit]

Katrin Linse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yan Liu (scientist) has been accepted[edit]

Yan Liu (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diane McKnight has been accepted[edit]

Diane McKnight, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roumania Metcheva has been accepted[edit]

Roumania Metcheva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bettina Meyer has been accepted[edit]

Bettina Meyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christina Riesselmann has been accepted[edit]

Christina Riesselmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michelle Rogan-Finnemore has been accepted[edit]

Michelle Rogan-Finnemore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 16:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Rumble has been accepted[edit]

Jane Rumble, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terry Wilson (scientist) has been accepted[edit]

Terry Wilson (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 02:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barbara Wienecke has been accepted[edit]

Barbara Wienecke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Wahlin has been accepted[edit]

Anna Wahlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In-Young Ahn has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, Janstrugnell. In-Young Ahn, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florica Toparceanu has been accepted[edit]

Florica Toparceanu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Keilana (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lois Jones (scientist) has been accepted[edit]

Lois Jones (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sharon Robinson (scientist) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sharon Robinson (scientist). Thanks! Hermera34 (talk) 10:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you contributed to have been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, Janstrugnell. The following articles that you've either created or significantly contributed to:

 have been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for In-Young Ahn[edit]

On 28 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article In-Young Ahn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that In-Young Ahn (pictured) was the first Korean woman to visit Antarctica? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/In-Young Ahn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, In-Young Ahn), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosemary Askin has been accepted[edit]

Rosemary Askin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Robinson (scientist) has been accepted[edit]

Sharon Robinson (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 19:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elizabeth Truswell[edit]

On 4 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elizabeth Truswell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elizabeth Truswell used ancient pollen to show that plants existed in Antarctica before the ice cap formed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Truswell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Elizabeth Truswell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lois Jones (scientist)[edit]

On 6 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lois Jones (scientist), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lois Jones led the first all-woman science team to Antarctica in 1969? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lois Jones (scientist). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lois Jones (scientist)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edith Fanta has been accepted[edit]

Edith Fanta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting our editathons[edit]

Thank you for contributing to our June 2016 editathons
There were over 350 articles on Women in Entertainment,
55 on Jewish Women's History and 50 on Women in LGBTQ

Our next event: Women in Halls of Fame

--Ipigott (talk) 16:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivian Pellizari has been accepted[edit]

Vivian Pellizari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},(unless this is on my own talk page) otherwise I may not see your reply) 07:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monique de Vries (July 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teresa Torres has been accepted[edit]

Teresa Torres, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333-blue 07:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valerie Masson-Delmotte has been accepted[edit]

Valerie Masson-Delmotte, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 17:13, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Bradshaw has been accepted[edit]

Margaret Bradshaw, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monique de Vries has been accepted[edit]

Monique de Vries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mduvekot (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Crosbie has been accepted[edit]

Kim Crosbie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 23:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robyn Millan (July 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corina Brussaard has been accepted[edit]

Corina Brussaard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 02:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jill Mikucki (July 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bradv 14:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gwen Fenton has been accepted[edit]

Gwen Fenton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Olech has been accepted[edit]

Maria Olech, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 16:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susana Agustí (August 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rebbing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rebbing 20:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jill Mikucki (August 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rebbing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rebbing 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More about Jill[edit]

Godd to hear you on radio and shoutout for wikibomb etc. I added some pix to her article and RT'ed it. Maybe you'd care to retweet as you have the right following. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retweeted! Fantastic images! Thanks so much Victuallers ! Janstrugnell (talk) 21:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veronica Vallejos has been accepted[edit]

Veronica Vallejos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Wizardman 14:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viviana Alder has been accepted[edit]

Viviana Alder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Wizardman 14:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Dey Nuttall (August 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Graciela Andrea Concheyro has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Graciela Andrea Concheyro. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graciela Andrea Concheyro (September 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 04:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marilyn Raphael has been accepted[edit]

Marilyn Raphael, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joe Roe (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robyn Millan has been accepted[edit]

Robyn Millan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rebbing 15:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Antarctic women[edit]

Hi Jan. I've put together a list of Antarctic women, ordered country by country. Perhaps you could check it through and see whether I've forgotten anyone. You might like to improve the list by adding more detailed descriptions or perhaps by adding small photographs. I see you still have a number of drafts undergoing the submission process. Let me know if you need any further help with these or any new articles. You've be doing a great job. Keep up the good work.--Ipigott (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Janstrugnell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anita Dey Nuttall[edit]

Hello, Janstrugnell. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Anita Dey Nuttall".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Anita Dey Nuttall[edit]

Draft:Anita Dey Nuttall, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anita Dey Nuttall and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Anita Dey Nuttall during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 06:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Graciela Andrea Concheyro, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Allison (scientist) has been accepted[edit]

Ian Allison (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vonda Cummings (November 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nikolaiho was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NikolaiHo☎️ 06:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Janstrugnell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessica Melbourne-Thomas (April 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 12:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vonda Cummings, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MadeYourReadThis (talk) 16:29, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessica Melbourne-Thomas has been accepted[edit]

Jessica Melbourne-Thomas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Janstrugnell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]