User talk:Jaximenes

License tagging for Image:Ximenes.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ximenes.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome and recommendations[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Jaximenes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Academic Challenger 21:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your interesting new articles[edit]

I see the interesting articles you've been adding on the Ximines family. Let me urge you to provide better references, so they dont wind up by getting deleted. A link to the article in another language's Wikipedia is not a reference, nor a link to another article in this one. And a link to a genealogy site also is not considered enough. You need a reference to a least one or better two published sources, print or web or both, and you need to explain in each article why the person is important, with reference to a source that provided the information. It is not enough to give the noble title--there is no presumption her that any but the highest nobility are notable. (This also applies to churchmen, even bishops). I didn't make the rules, but that's what people do here, and it would be a shame if you lost the work. So go slower, and make sure you have the references first. The custom here is to examine new articles almost immediately, so its best to write them off-line first. Best wishes with them all. DGG 04:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

Thank you for your kind, and sage pieces of advice. The problem with Wikipedia is that one has to largely find articles, or references online, that may be available merely in book form. I know a lot about the Ximenes family genealogical roots, but short of lugging around Cockayne with me and double-checking if that's where I read it, etc. it will be difficult to substantiate them, entirely, with verifiable data.

In the case of the semi-challenged, General Sir David Ximenes, for example, or similar, I really feel that is a judgement call on the part of the User, as to whether he or she believes they are noteworthy perhaps in ways others do not.

For me, Wikipedia is there to reference everything found on this earth, even if it's one perhaps terse line noting dates, and background. A personage who actually ruled over a swath of land, FOR ME, is more important and relevant than many of the "vanity" entries I noticed were on the Ximenes page, earlier. Sadly, not too much is known about some of the more distant historical figures, else I would have already added them (but one can always search and search!).

However, as mentioned, your advice is definitely going to be followed by me, especially as I acquaint myself more with Wikipedia. Note, I have a degree in history from Oxford University, but as they say, that and a dollar will get you a cup of coffee (on Wikipedia!). Thanks again, DGG. jaximenes 07:52, 22 June (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of people with two or more professions[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of people with two or more professions, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with two or more professions. Thank you. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BeAgainstPa.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BeAgainstPa.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Jaximenes! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 901 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Claudio de Jesus Ximenes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of João Ximenes Braga[edit]

The article João Ximenes Braga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michel Ximenes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michel Ximenes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Ximenes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 13:22, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Moäng Ratu Dona Ines Ximenes da Silva of Flores for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moäng Ratu Dona Ines Ximenes da Silva of Flores is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moäng Ratu Dona Ines Ximenes da Silva of Flores until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kazamzam (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]