User talk:Jcwebdev

Hello, Jcwebdev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you're talking about an equation, or a solute dissolved in a solvent, the word "solutions" is a sure sign of advertisement[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Energy Solutions International, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jcwebdev. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Energy Solutions International, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Company accounts are not permitted here[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 14:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcwebdev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My username 'jcwebdev' has nothing to do with the entry that I created (encyclopaedic, for ESI not for my own personal gain) and is my default username that I use elsewhere on the web. It in no way links to my business or line of work. As you've blocked my IP (please explain where I went wrong and I'll amend it) I can't even create a new user account.

Decline reason:

Username represents an organisation as As per BWilkins' comments below Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As per the honking welcome message at the top, you have admitted that you created an entry on behalf of a client - this is massive conflict of interest. Your account - or your IP - cannot be unblocked until the community is convinced you will not create promotional articles about companies. Your username also appears to be related to a company (admittedly not the one you wrote about) but it still violates the username policy that you agreed to when you signed up. You may wish to read WP:GAB and amend the above accordingly (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bill, please review the content that I added (might not be possible as I think OrangeMike deleted it and blocked my account). It is no more promotional than the content on any other page pertaining to a company so could we proceed like this: you unblock my IP address, I create a personal wiki account and then proceed to add the content personally. As its informative as oppose to promotional, I can't see that being a violation in terms and additionally as I've not taken payment from anyone to do this would be adding content to Wikipedia purely for the purpose of serving the community and adding knowledge to the site.

Since you don't seem to be getting it...Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article you claim was not promotional said that your client sold "solutions". Except for somebody like Sigma-Aldrich, the chemical supplier, the word "solutions" is a sure sign that you're promoting something. They may sell software, or services, or hardware, or equipment; but they don't sell "solutions". It's one of those buzzwords, like "leading vendor" and "cutting-edge" and "up-and-coming" and "revolutionary breakthrough", that tip us off that promotion is being committed. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, forgive my use of buzz words. I understand you don't run a business directory but please tell me how organizations like Starlims, Bangkok_Patana_School or Bowler_Offroad all have information about themselves published on Wikipedia? Conflict of interest is understood, I cannot add/edit this entry if I'm paid to do so but surely would be well within my right to do so from a personal standpoint on a personal account, provided the entry was notable. There were two references to independent news websites in the article that you guys deleted. Are the Sacramento Bee newspaper or BusinessWeek.com not to be considered notable?

I understand your position and your terms and condtions quite clearly now, but beyond my use of buzzwords and username seeming to pertain to my own business (not that of the entry I had created) have I done anything wrong? Can my account be unblocked in order that I make use of Wikipedia as an independent and impartial user

Thank you for bringing those articles to our attention. WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS can never be used as an argument against deletion/for inclusion. I would also highly doubt that those articles were written by the organizations themselves - indeed, we'll look further into those. For the final time, as it has been determined that your username clearly represents an organization, the only way to unblock would be to permit a name change (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For a name change - Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} to this page Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]