User talk:Jean Larrieu

This is Jean Larrieu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chipironier has been accepted[edit]

Chipironier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you, i will improuve this Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you, i will improuve this Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I created this article on the chipironer, what can I do to improve it. Thanks for your advices. Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't really understand what I have to do to get the Jean Larrieu article published? Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 16:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

First the images. You claimed all of them as created by you, which is clearly not the case, they are either official documents or images taken before the dates you claim. Owning the documents doesn't necessarily mean you own the copyright. However, I see that my nominations for deletion at commons have mean moved to deletion discussion, so there may be some hope there. It may be possible for you to use them under another licence or fair use WP:Fair use, but I'm not an admin on Commons.

Many problems with the text.

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

Nearly all the text is unreferenced, and the few refs you do give need proper formatting. There is a non-functioning link in one that appears to go to Commons

You have an extensive bibliography of uncertain purpose, they don't appear to be used as references. They look a mess because you've used a french equivalent of Cite book that doesn't work properly here

If what you have written is correct he is probably notable as defined above, but much of it has no verification, not even the claimed decorations

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

who perfectly mastered these specialties in view of his experiences

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I think this is a real problem. Huge swathes of your text are just cut-and-paste of copyright material, mostly without acknowledging the source, which is definitely not permitted. if you use copyright text, you must acknowledge and reference the source, and you must use only what is required for illustrative purposes, not as a replacement for writing proper text in your own words, and it should only make up a limited fraction of the total text. Much of the text is just quoting him, he is hardly an independent third-party source for himself.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. I think if you want to try again, you will need to start from scratch, writing in your own words and using referenced reliable independent sources. The article is likely to be much shorter that this kitchen sink effort, but will be of better quality Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir,

Thank you for your judicious comments.

I will correct this article.

The photos are those that the French Army gave him in 1944, 1961, 1963, etc., the quotes from his feats of arms are documents that were given to him on these occasions. His BCRA agent ID card was in his personal belongings and I am his son and sole heir. The document of his operation in Lyon in 1944 is unique, it was he who wrote it on a typewriter for the DGSE in 1947. It is one of the most complete and comprehensive Jedburgh mission reports. the most accurate that still exists, most were lost in 1945-45 by the BCRA. I deposited them in duplicate at the Military Archives in Vincennes in France.

Kind regards, Jean Larrieu Jean Larrieu (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]