User talk:Jeanjung212

Special:Contributions/Jeanjung212

My contribs Jeanjung212 (talk) 17:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

References

North Star Academy

Hi! I merged North Star Academy into Redwood City School District as is the common practice with elementary schools. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

That works for me, thanks. Jeanjung212 (talk) 18:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Photo requests

BTW do you do photo requests in San Mateo County? There are places which haven't yet had pictures put on Wikipedia. WhisperToMe (talk) 11:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

I can attempt to do some, currently I've been focusing around Redwood City to bring up the standards of the articles. Jeanjung212 (talk) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Can you please change the photo of Shah Rukh Khan on Wikipedia.. Gypsy soul (talk) 14:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

@Gypsy soul: I would suggest finding an image that's been uploaded to commons already that qualifies under fair use, Commons:Category:Shahrukh Khan and then asking on the Talk:Shah Rukh Khan page for consensus on the change. Looking through the archives of the talk page it appears that multiple attemps to change the image before have failed as the images were not fair use often. Jeanjung212 (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pacific Shores Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alameda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sequoia Union High School District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sequoia High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for this. How refreshing to get this kind of response on a contentious topic such as this. I apologise for sounding a little grouchy, but if you go through the various archives to do with infoboxless articles, you'll see that this is a pretty emotive subject. Next to a cure for the common cold, this is as unsolvable as it is troublesome. Cassianto^Talk 20:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks to you for taking the time to inform me. The more time I spend on wikipedia the more I learn how nuanced the style and community is everyday. No worries about being a little grouchy, it's understandable when facing a continuous tide of people that don't initially understand a view and then instead of attempting to learn become combative. I'll be on the lookout for more reading and research in the future now that you turned me onto more of the resources. Jeanjung212 (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Room (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Room (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 22:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Room (film)

The article The Room (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Room (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 02:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Room (film)

The article The Room (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Room (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 04:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jeanjung212. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Kappa-dera Temple

On 7 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kappa-dera Temple, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that offerings of cucumber (pictured) are left at the Kappa-dera Temple to appease Kappas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kappa-dera Temple. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kappa-dera Temple), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Precious

cleanup gnome

Thank you for quality articles such as The Room (film) and Kappa-dera, for improving articles about the San Francisco Bay Area and Redwood City, for gnomish fixes of links, urls, it's vs. its, adding for wikidata, adding date templates (among others), for images, - Jean, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1933 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt It's actually meant alot as a gnome over the years to be able to look back on that. I'm sure it must have felt at the time like I was tailing your DYK articles alot too. There's been no gnome stuff for me to do on your DYK for awhile since you're so thorough! Even though I've been more active lately on the wikidata side of things than the article space it's good. So thank you! -Jeanjung212 (talk) 07:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Once precious, always precious ;) - I have to confess that in today's pictured DYK, I misspelled the subjects name several times, which a gnome noticed only yesterday ... - I proudly carry the icon - as the only topicon - in memory of a great missed gnome with a short career. Thanks for staying around! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jeanjung212. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Further Reading?

Please let me understand why you replace External links by Further Reading. An entry by the German National Library is not really "reading", nor another lexikon entry. Make two groups, perhaps? Further reading? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt I felt moving them to a Further Reading section would be preferrable to complete removal if following the standards of Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Otherwise based on those standards as well as WP:NOTRSMUSIC several of the external links in the section would be removed completely. Jeanjung212 (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Please tell me more, - so far I thought External links is the place for such things, not used as sources, but informative otherwise. Please give two examples and say what problem? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

For example the link to discogs would be removed per WP:ELBLP as WP:NOTRSMUSIC as it is not reliable and BLP articles are held to a higher standard. Another example is the overlink of foreign language material while English wikipedia has a strong preference for English external links per WP:NONENGEL. In particular with the Hilbert link which does not provide information not already covered in the other references and links in the article. The simplest way to keep the Hilbert link in the article would be to use it as a citation instead of having it within the External Links section. The large number of foreign language links in the reason I moved the other interview links to the Further Reading section as well. Another example I would remove from External Links is the German National Library link as it is already present in Authority Control template following WP:LINKSTOAVOID. If you disagree with my interpretation of the standards and want to move the links all back into the External Links section and keep them all, I'm okay with that. I just wanted to take the time to explain my thoughts on this because you took the time to ask and I generally enjoy editing the articles I see you involved in. Thanks Jeanjung212 (talk) 19:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining. I won't revert (just perhaps say "reading" instead of "Reading"). I only try to understand. You are the second to say something against Discogs, so I won't use it again. They are better than WorldCat in detail, but sowhat. Hilbert is her agent, so never ever would I use that for reference. I didn't read it all, so couldn't tell if they offered more than other references or not, - it's just standard for opera singers to have the agent, especially when s/he has no official website. The German National Library link is another standard feature because go around and ask what authority provides? Most people seem not to know what the abbreviations mean, and ignore the whole lot of information. - Summary: I usually "park" in external links what is not good enough for reference, but still informative, so the standards for RS don't count. Always learning, and thank you again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata

Hey, I've undone some of your contributions to The Haunted Island because I'm not so sure about the reliability of Wikidata for article content. It's probably just better to use the local information instead. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

TheAwesomeHwyh Wikidata uses the same sources as the article so not sure why the reliability of it would come into question, not only that but the Infobox video game template is designed with the intent to use Wikidata for any field not manually entered into the box itself. Your revert also removed the addition of information including the exact release date and the external link to mobygames that many video games articles have. You're the main editor of the article so whatever way you want it in the end is fine with me. The main content I wanted to add in which was the reviews template is still there. Jeanjung212 (talk) 19:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Jeanjung212 It doesn't look like the Wikidata template actually shows it's sources- you have to click through to Wikidata in order to see what sources are being cited. If I'm not wrong, I think there was a controversy regarding using Wikidata in a similar manner to this a while back. Let me try to find those threads. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Jeanjung212 Here it is:

• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive950#Hard to detect mobile vandalism,
• Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 154#Discussion at ANI about Wikidata use in mobile view,
• Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#Rfc: Remove description taken from Wikidata from mobile view of en-WP, Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive 138#Blockers to having short description on mobile,
• Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 145#RfC: Populating article descriptions magic word, and
• Wikipedia talk:Wikidata/2018 State of affairs#Short_descriptions. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

TheAwesomeHwyh It's all good, I know there's tension between wikidata and wikipedia sometimes, even though to me it's all the same wonderful thing. I do edits and watch pages on both and enjoy both and. That's why I choose not to really push for anything on articles and if the major contributors want something a certain way, best to just go with the flow since there's always other pages to edit and work on.Jeanjung212 (talk) 20:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, to be fair, I think I might support migrating more infoboxes to Wikidata if the information at Wikidata only showed up on Wikipedia if it has a source on Wikidata- a lot of things on Wikidata aren't sourced and that's a pretty big problem for me. Maybe I should start contributing over there more? TheAwesomeHwyh 20:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hiroshi Nagahama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello!

Is there a way to add those to the list without breaking the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C50:7F:7121:AC5F:D9AE:E8A8:70D7 (talk) 14:59, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

To not break the page you need to ensure when you delete comment code that you remove both the start AND end portions of the comment code, otherwise the page is not parsed correctly. However, also to not have your edits reverted, you'll need to add sources to those sections as the comments state. --Jeanjung212 (talk) 15:08, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Redwood City Historic Commercial Buildings

Can you fix the template? Or find someone who can? It shouldnt generate categories which dont exist. Rathfelder (talk) 16:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Rathfelder I don't have Template Editor permissions, so I can't change the template. As far as I can tell it seems the users who created and maintain the template are aware of this functionality and even include a section about it on the documentation page, so I doubt they will change it. Jeanjung212 (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Workboard logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Workboard logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

The article now uses an image on Commons File:WorkBoard_Logo_2019.svg, so it's fine that this gets removed. Thanks. Jeanjung212 (talk) 19:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Workboard

The article Workboard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article - basically a press release. No references. This is the less-puffed-up version, see here for the really puffed-up version. Despite the grandiose claims, there is no evidence of notability under WP:CORP, WP:GNG or any other guideline; a WP:BEFORE shows zero beyond press releases and occasional passing mentions. Should have been G11'd at creation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 18:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

@David Gerard: It seems to me like people that work at Workboard have been editing the article with the IP addresses and an account called WorkBoard itself doing several revisions to the article. This article used to actually have references as can be seen in this old revision here. I think this revision would most likely be the best to revert to as it is pre the fluff the WorkBoard account added and after user Mean as Custard revised the article to correct for fluff the IP addresses added. Jeanjung212 (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Trouble is, that version doesn't have any RSes either - the Forbes and HuffPost are both contributor blogs, neither is the RS news outlet ... do you know of any RS coverage of Workboard? - David Gerard (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

@David Gerard: I was able to locate coverage by VentureBeat, TechCrunch, GeekWire, ABC7News. I searched on the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard archives and it seems to me that these would be fine to use. Jeanjung212 (talk) 19:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

excellent! yeah, feel free to WP:TNT the press-release version and rewrite from the good sources :-) always nice when an article turns out to be saveable - David Gerard (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll see what I can do in the next few days to get this article back into usable status. Jeanjung212 (talk) 23:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Jeanjung212! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)