Hello, Jebuss! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just quite curious about your quite rapid reverts of my edits over at Benjamin Cohen (British journalist). Do you have any connection at all to User_talk:Philsome - and/or the subject of that article - as your editing actions look quite like they might. Forgive me potentially breaching WP:AGF and also potentially casting negative aspersions against you in relation to WP:NPOV but when I look at your edits and those of User_talk:Philsome that is what I am left with - nothing but questions as to your neutrality. The subject of the article is the issue here. None of what you removed was "unsourced" as you suggested in your edit notes to the article Benjamin Cohen (British journalist). I would be interested to learn where exactly you think my edits were unsourced?
--Satellite9876 (talk) 04:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can really only repeat my continued requests to you that when you disagree with any editor, you should take it to their Talk page, or the Talk page of the article in question. It is also worth reminding you that your block did not result from me requesting any action at all. It actually came about because you did not like my edits of Benjamin Cohen (British journalist) and tried to have me blocked. The decision-maker looked at our actions and decided you seemed to be in error. Karma? Who knows. Much less do I care.
In any case, thought you would want to know that there is a Third Opinion request happening relevant to these matters. --Satellite9876 (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you can prove "many" of Mr Cohen's reports appear on CNN you can leave it in. If not, it should not be in the article.
--Satellite9876 (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In my humble opinion, it would have been far more appropriate for you to have made contact via my talk page than posting to various noticeboards regarding our differing views on the article Benjamin Cohen (British journalist). But there you go.
--Satellite9876 (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
