User talk:Jembay

Big league jew[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Big league jew) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- dhp1080 ^(u·t·c) 21:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently re-created the article Big league jew, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. --Ginkgo 100 ^talk 21:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shnizzlers list[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Shnizzlers list) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- dhp1080 ^(u·t·c) 21:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted[edit]

Both pages listed above have been deleted. Please do not re-create these pages unless you can immediately assert notability in a verifiable manner. The encyclopedia cannot wait for you to "finish" something "tomorrow". RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page deleted[edit]

Statements likely to be insensitive to ethnic groups require further explanation; therefore, your user page as it existed has been deleted. Please take care to explain statements that could construed as insulting. Thank you. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spot Marks the X and Jab rap artist[edit]

Both articles have been deleted. Please read Wikipedia guidelines on notability and its verifiability policy so that you may create articles that will survive scrutiny for inclusion. Thank you. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 22:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia[edit]

Wikipedia is a big Facist arse!!! Hell Yeah —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.109.123.108 (talk) 19:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

June 2007[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to coolio. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -FeralDruid 09:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Groovie Goolies, you will be blocked from editing. -- BlastOButter42 ^See Hear _Speak 09:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Americancheese, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -FeralDruid 09:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Al-Qaeda (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Oulder Hill Community School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tango (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Oulder Hill Community School. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oulder Hill Community School was changed by Jembay (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-24T12:52:27+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Americancheese, you will be blocked from editing. Marasmusine (talk) 12:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 82.71.216.91 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Jembay (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto reviewed|82.71.216.91|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Killjameshoward". The reason given for Killjameshoward's block is: "Vandalism-only account".|Jmlk17|

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Jembay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

82.71.216.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Killjameshoward". The reason given for Killjameshoward's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Jmlk17 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jembay (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kamek (talk) 09:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of P.I.S.S[edit]

A tag has been placed on P.I.S.S requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Macy 23:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation[edit]

Creating pages to attack people is not acceptable on wikipedia and if you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sam Blacketer (talk) 23:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Wikipedia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Avnjay^Talk 23:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jembay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is a breach of the freedom of speech article of the human rights laws

Decline reason:

You can say what you like, but you have no right to have the Wikimedia Foundation publish it all. When you start attacking other people, we tell you to rant somewhere else. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.