User talk:Jemsta1979

Welcome!

Hello, Jemsta1979, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Concentrate Design, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Teapotgeorge^Talk 13:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Concentrate Design[edit]

A tag has been placed on Concentrate Design, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 13:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Hi Teapot George. I believe I have edited everything satisfactorily. But do tell me otherwise and I will resolve. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 23:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 23:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Teapot George, I just saw all these comments and I am sorry I can see you have been telling me all that I have been doing wrong and I havent done any of it! I will read it all now and obey and update your comments accordingly. talk

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit and is especially useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 23:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC) Teapot George, sorry I havent been added comments for my edits. I will do so moving forward. Thank you for your patience. jemma[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Concentrate Design. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit and is especially useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 13:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teapot George, sorry I havent been added comments for my edits. I will do so moving forward. Thank you for your patience. jemma

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark Champkins, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Teapot George, I am not affiliated with Concentrate Design at all. I do know Mark Champkins though, and put up these two wiki pages because he has some notoreity and will soon be publishing a book so more information will be added then. If there are still sentences which still infer a conflict, please let me know and I will remove them. jemma

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

Teapot George, I have read these and think I have edited the tone sufficiently, but do let me know where it is to the contrary. I have also tried to add citations but I believe that because the CNN, BBC movies are located on the Concentrate Design website, you are not ok with them. Is this correct? Please let me know if googlevideo or youtube is acceptable? jemma

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 15:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teapot George, I am not affiliated with Concentrate Design at all. I do know Mark Champkins though, and put up these two wiki pages because he has some notoreity and will soon be publishing a book so more information will be added then. If there are still sentences which still infer a conflict, please let me know and I will remove them. jemma

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Markchampkins2.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Markchampkins2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

Teapot George, this image has been removed and I added another one. jemma

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teapot George, could I add these links as references for the BBC, Discovery and CNN citation?

http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=S2Z&resnum=0&q=youtube+champkins&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=upYKS6bMJsyy4QbD8dnECw&sa=X&oi=video_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CBAQqwQwAA#hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=S2Z&resnum=0&q=youtube+champkins&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=upYKS6bMJsyy4QbD8dnECw&sa=X&oi=video_result_group&ct=title&ved=0CBAQqwQwAA&qvid=youtube+champkins&vid=4961637781865152369 Jemsta1979

Also, could I used this as a citation for the Harry Hill television show comment?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZyfzUfQS7w jemma

File copyright problem with File:Markchampkins3.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Markchampkins3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the copyright for creative commons [User talk:jemsta1979|jemma]])

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Markchampkins2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Markchampkins2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 05:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Markchampkins1.JPG[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Markchampkins1.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 05:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Markchampkins.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Markchampkins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 05:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Foodforthoughtlunchbox.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Foodforthoughtlunchbox.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the copyright information for this image (jemma)

Conflict of interest[edit]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for advertising or self-promotion, or a vanity press. As such, it should contain only material that complies with its content policies, and Wikipedians must place the interests of the encyclopedia first. Any editor who gives priority to outside interests may be subject to a conflict of interest.

There are no firm criteria to determine whether a conflict of interest exists, but there are warning signs. Adding material that appears to promote the interests or visibility of an article's author, its author's family members, employer, associates, or their business or personal interests, places the author in a conflict of interest. When editors write to promote their own interests, their contributions often show a characteristic lack of connection to anything the general reader might want to consult as a reference. If you do write an article on an area in which you are personally involved, be sure to write in a neutral tone and cite reliable, third-party published sources, and beware of unintentional bias. Neutral point of view is one of Wikipedia's five pillars. Cheers Teapotgeorge^Talk 15:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links to copyright violations[edit]

Do you have evidence that the site to which you link has permission to use clips from the BBC and Sky? If permission has not been granted, then linking to these clips is a violation of our policy. The JPS ^{talk to me} 22:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]