User talk:Jeremyawesome

Sony Nashville[edit]

Stop adding a link to Sony Nashville in the BNA Records article. It redirects to Sony Music Nashville, which is already in place in the article. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Warner Music Nashville[edit]

A tag has been placed on Warner Music Nashville requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 02:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Your recent edit to the page Lyric Street Records appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. There is absolutely nothing online that says Jessi Alexander was ever signed to Lyric Street. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charts articles[edit]

Hello, and thanks for your contributions. Two new articles you've created, Music Row Charts and Radio & Records Charts‎ are a bit of a mystery: what are they lists of? They have no WP:Lead sections. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 04:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Music Row Charts. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Top Jim (talk) 04:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Radio & Records Charts, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Top Jim (talk) 04:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Music Row Charts, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Top Jim (talk) 04:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Music Row Charts[edit]

The article Music Row Charts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced list of artists, with no assertion of why they're grouped together here..

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Top Jim (talk) 04:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radio & Records Charts[edit]

The article Radio & Records Charts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced list of artists, with no assertion of why they're grouped together here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Top Jim (talk) 05:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Music Row Charts[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Radio & Records Charts[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:2010 Elizabeth Hendrickson.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:2010 Elizabeth Hendrickson.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2010 Elizabeth Hendrickson.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:2010 Elizabeth Hendrickson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Elizabeth hendrickson202.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Elizabeth hendrickson202.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kinu ^t/_c 04:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:B7ddb8e269384389 chloe2 xlarge.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:B7ddb8e269384389 chloe2 xlarge.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:060209 EHendrickson YR 240x320.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:060209 EHendrickson YR 240x320.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:E38238c9178e1482 Picture 9 xlarge.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:E38238c9178e1482 Picture 9 xlarge.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:93da01abc92ae795 chloe xlarge.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:93da01abc92ae795 chloe xlarge.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Elizabeth-Hendrickson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth-Hendrickson.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Normal YRJune1066.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Normal YRJune1066.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 02:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files lacking copyright information, you may be blocked from editing. If you are unsure of the correct copyright template, please refer to the list of image copyright tags or ask at the copyright question page. Kinu ^t/_c 23:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In short: (1) you should not upload images obviously copied from other sites without proper attribution, and (2) Wikipedia cannot use replaceable non-free images of living individuals in articles (i.e., at Elizabeth Hendrickson). --Kinu ^t/_c 23:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Biggerpicture.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Biggerpicture.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Big Machine Records, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Caldorwards4 (talk) 03:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Montgomery Gentry discography, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 22:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

This is not appropriate tone. Please don't use contractions or terms like "currently" as info can change from day to day. And answer your damn talk page. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Your addition to Kellie Pickler has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You've been warned about these images before CutOffTies (talk) 02:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evansville television articles...[edit]

I have reverted all of your edits. You cannot claim station logos as your 'own work' at all, and they are unneeded for any purpose. Nate • (chatter) 06:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Montgomery Gentry[edit]

Please don't add your personal opinions to articles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evansville TV articles...[edit]

I have reverted your edits to WTVW. There is nothing right now to suggest they would take CW affiliation, and even if there is, it must be sourced by local or industry media. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 08:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Danny Gokey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adding obviously false song titles to the discography, plus your other erroneous/unhelpful edits to Montgomery Gentry and the TV articles, suggest that you are no longer here to edit in good faith. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Big Machine Records, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 16:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here I do understand what I did wrong the files I uploaded were copright and some of the content I added was false information but I will do better I promise to learn how to use Wikipedia the right way because if I don't I will be blocked for good please help me do better and give me another chance. }}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Please note this block reads as indefinite, but I want to stress this is not a permanent removal of editing privileges. There has been a lot of discussion on this talk page to which you have not responded, Jeremy, and also a discussion at AN/I linked above. If you would read and take on some of these criticisms there is no reason why you should not be unblocked. However I do think it would be a good idea if you asked for a mentor to guide you through some of the things you have been getting wrong here for a while now. Please follow the instructions above about how to post the unblock request; if you post Your reason... as something like a willingness to use your talk page in future and to accept mentoring, I will unblock to see whether this improves your contributions. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 09:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy, I received your email but I prefer to keep discussions on-wiki and therefore transparent to others. So I hope you don't mind if I reply here. You can still edit this page to continue the discussion. What you need to do is copy the this text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here please unblock me I will do better }} and replace Your reason here... with some text indicating that you understand why you have been blocked, and assuring us that you will not continue this behaviour. Another admin will then review your request. Don't forget to read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 19:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeremyawesome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not abuse Wikipedia again please unblock me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have reposted Jeremy's request which was made by trying to edit the instructions above, rather than copying the template here Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 07:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately he shows no real understanding of what led to the block, and no indication of how he'll move forward. A quick read of WP:GAB would be a good start (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy, you've tied to edit this page to make an appeal but you're not following the instructions. I did it for you last time but it's probably better if you learn to do it yourself. First, go here and read about what you need to do to successfully appeal a block. Then copy this text to your clipboard: {{unblock|reason=''Your reason here''...}}. Next open this talk page in order to edit it (hit the "edit this page" tab above. Go to the very bottom of the page and pastein what's in your clipboard. Then remove the text Your reason here... and type in your reason why an unblock is appropriate. Sorry if this is longwinded but it's something you're going to have to get the hang of. I'll watch here and check you have it right. Use the preview button to see if it's worked, and if it has a nice blue box will appear with your appeal inside it. Good luck! Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 16:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope he does not have to get the hang of using unblock templates :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jeremyawesome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do understand what I did wrong the files I uploaded were copright and some of the content I added was false information but I will do better I promise to learn how to use Wikipedia the right way because if I don't I will be blocked for good please help me do better and give me another chance.

Accept reason:

OK, for a new user just getting the hang of things that seems good enough. But do be careful Jeremy, folks will be watching your edits now and also you know what is and what isn't OK. So any future block would be longer; let's hope there isn't one! Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 21:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Corkythehornetfan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 03:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 03:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]