User talk:Jesusinmysock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let's take a break[edit]

I don't know... I thoght it was cool.Jesusinmysock 19:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enter comments here[edit]

Not that anybody would though.Jesusinmysock 20:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I refuse to enter my comments here. This violates my constitutional rights.

RanDawg 17:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good man Good man... WAIT! you just entered somthin'! crazy you just voilated your own right.

I joined that metal project even though I don't think I could contirbute much.

me too. i just like helping.

RanDawg 21:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Them user boxes look pretty nifty I should figure out how to use those.Jesusinmysock 14:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry its been a while. My good Friend (really a complete loser :-) would probably like to know you. Since i'm typing this on his computer, (he's looking over my shoulder) he will most likely post here soon.

RanDawg 21:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not a loser! It is all lies! OK... Maybe not.... But if I'm a loser, he is too!--Jesuspwnz 00:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My concern about your username[edit]

Hello, Jesusinmysock, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again!--Cometstyles 19:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man get over it It's just a name. You may be concerned but thats your problem. I refuse to change my username. I'm trying to be as nice as I can. I can kind of understand your concern then agin I cant. Oh I get It my Middle Name is Jesus.

I do not find it inappropriate either, however, Jesusismysock could have found a better way to put it. IronCrow (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC discussion of your username (Jesusinmysock)[edit]

Hello, Jesusinmysock, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Wikipedia has a policy on what usernames editors can use. Unfortunately, concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with that policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it here. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. -- Cometstyles 20:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As nothing seems to have come out of the last RfC, I've started another one here. --The Raven's Apprentice (PokéNav|Trainer Card) 14:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account with this username has been blocked indefinitely because the username may be rude or inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization or website, contains the word Wikipedia or the name of any other Wikimedia Foundation project, or is otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username. Wikipedia:Username policy provides guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may appeal on your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you. Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible.

If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions:

  1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} to your user talk page. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked.
  3. You will have 24 hours after the unblock to file a request on Wikipedia:Changing username before you may be re-blocked. Note that this can only be done before you create the new one. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is a lot easier to create a new account. Rlevse 16:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH[edit]

I like your username and I don't see the big deal. What I find objectionable is your calling evolution "stupid", seeing as how it's the theory that is the basis for all life sciences, is backed by decades of evidence and is agreed upon by 99.9% of all scientists. You're entitled to your opinion, but now that I know you have thrown logic and reason out the window, I know where you're starting from regarding your contributions to wikipedia, and I'm going to watch your edits more closely.Rglong 02:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my God, so he doesn't believe in evolution? Leave him alone. Would you go to an evolutionist's page who said he thought creation was stupid and say a similiar thing? I doubt it. And it's not really the base of all life sciences, it's for one thing a scientific theory. Theories are only the basis of theories, not scientific law. (Chemicals, compounds, etc = basis) And 99.9% of scientists? Please. Seeing as you use the term "Scientist" in the wrong way... A scientist is a person who uses the scientific method to do research. Scientists include theoreticians, mathmaticians, experamentalists, physicists, etc. I doubt that most of matmaticians are evolutionists. Same deal with physicists. Seeing as about 75% of the United States is Christian, and Christians can be scientists too... man... 99.9% just seems sooo unscientific. You are using "scientist" in the wrong way. It's unscientific to say that. Remember that the scientific community never "states" anything, it only makes considerations. Giuseppe Sermonti? Antonino Zichichi? Wolfgang Smith? Man, there are more, would you like a list? Now I'm not saying I am a creationist of an evolutionist or anything like that, I'm just saying, that was a statement without fact. And if you watch his edits because he doesn't believe in evolution, that's profiling buddy, and you will get in trouble for that. Don't stereotype him because he's a creationist. IronCrow 02:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Full Armor of God Broadcast[edit]

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]


ICHTHUS

January 2012
Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jesusinmysock&oldid=1145887970"