User talk:JetBlast/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Dead
Hi, FYI removed the BLP prod tag. article already stated died 1958, therefore not a BLP prod. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thats not a problem, when i applied the BLP it didn't say he had died in the article. --JetBlast (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Seriously? You felt the need to tag a new article that is obviously being worked on by a well established community member? Reedy (talk) 22:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- To be fair i didn't know it was knew (should have checked). I did just stumble across this after watch lightfeilds on TV. As an established user i would have thought you would have know to draft it in your namespace first? Anyway BLPPROD is not a usual delete tag. It gives people plenty of time to get it sourced. --JetBlast (talk) 22:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should now give Reedy a wikilove kitten so he does not cry to much and deletes the master database? :p --Jeroen De Dauw (talk) 22:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- JetBlast, keep in mind that when you are "prodding" something, you are, in fact, proposing it for deletion. The burden is still on you to take simple steps like checking the article's history, and it gives you no extra authority to tell people where they should draft their articles. Drafting in the use namespace is a particular convention that not everyone follows (or needs to). Above all else, you should take care because sticking a prod tag on an article is still nominating another editor's work for deletion, and it's never fun to get one of those notices. Doing so carelessly is likely to alienate editors. I removed your tag from the article. Dominic·t 22:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm H.b.sh. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Alliance for Water Efficiency, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. H.b.sh (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm H.b.sh. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Zgodovina, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. H.b.sh (talk) 21:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, but i didn't mark it as reviewed. Or i didn't intend to. It must be twinkle doing that for me. --JetBlast (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Gbeach03 SPI
Hi. Could you take another look at your SPI request (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gbeach03)? It doesn't look like a case of sockpuppetry to me. Rather, it appears that the user initially created an account with the name of his organization — and when that account was blocked per policy, he followed the instructions in the block notice and created another account with a different, non-objectionable name. Or am I missing something here? — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 00:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, If you have a look (if you can) the company account name was blocked after i put the sock puppet case in. When i put the case in both accounts where unblocked. It was me who reported the username after reporting the sock puppet stuff. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 08:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your help on the Orla Watson page, Jetblast. I am new to this and appreciate any help I can get. --Alanwilliams101 (talk) 03:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)--Alanwilliams101 (talk) 03:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Eaglexpress Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Eaglexpress Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Re
Frankly I never figured countervandalism might be considered a 3RR violation, feel free to hold and encourage every vandalism you like, it won't longer be my business reverting them. There's a strong canvassing on a certain webforum, so when they'll come back removing the multiple isse template I'll have to do nothing, wont I?--Vituzzu (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- It wasn't vandalism. The delete template can be removed by anybody no problem, the template says "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page." The template also clearly says regarding the removal "If this template is removed, do not replace it." So you shouldn't have restored the template never mind multiple edits. To be honest you are lucky a Admin didn't notice or take action. --JetBlast (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- The multiple issues template being removed is vandalism, however. Vituzzu is a m:steward and enwiki is not his home wiki, so I'm willing to AGF and assume that he did not know about the PROD process. --Rs chen 7754 20:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- ((edit conflict)) {{Multiple issues}} too? Can you see any improvement by the user going on removing it for years? There's just a pointless comment made by an user pretending (as you can see from edit summaries) to be two different people, if I might be "50% wrong" for the speedy we should always take care of WP:UCS and WP:GAME. Sorry if I am too harsh but there has been two years of crosswiki canvassing which definitely made me bored of it, I don't care about the keeping or removal of that article, I simply want that every evaluation about it is made by third trusted users. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- The multiple issues template being removed is vandalism, however. Vituzzu is a m:steward and enwiki is not his home wiki, so I'm willing to AGF and assume that he did not know about the PROD process. --Rs chen 7754 20:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
To be honest i am not disputing the multi issue removal. Its more to do with re-adding the PROD. The template is pretty clear.... --JetBlast (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Om Swami
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Lead section of the article "Om Swami"
Hello JetBlast,
There is a message on my article "Om Swami" to re-write the lead section. Now that we have made that required update, what needs to be done to get this message removed? Please let me know if the article requires any additional updates.
By the way, thank you for the Citation Barnstar. :)
Best Regards, Pavani — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavani Om (talk • contribs) 20:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- Not yet. The lead needs to tell us who the person is and how he is notable. Currently this does not do this. --JetBlast (talk) 18:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Please help
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback April 2013
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I think I have found the answer. However, your comment is always appreciated. Thanks. WorldTraveller101Did I mess up? 13:12, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hong Kong Typhoon
I've declined your speedy request as the text quoted was written by someone who died in 1922. I would doubt that any of the other authors died less than 75 years ago. It's a bit of a mess for an article, though. 19:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Logan International Airport discussion
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your input would be much appreciated. Thanks. 
World Traveller 101 23:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for all of your help. World Traveller 101 19:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC) |
Aer Arann
I note that you reverted my addition of a hull-loss accident claiming that the url didn't support the claim. Did you actually read the report? Page 3 (SYNOPSIS), 1st paragraph, last sentence states "There were no injuries but the aircraft was deemed to be damaged beyond economical repair."
I'm not in the habit of adding unreferenced material to Wikipedia, and would therefore ask that you revert you edit. Mjroots (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, i reverted the edit because the addition's source didn't link to that PDF above. It linked to this. I did open the sub PDF's from this link but i there isn't any info about this incident. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 19:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm, not sure what happened there. It opens OK with Mozilla Firefox. Anyhow, I see that there is previous discussion on the talk page re this accident with consensus not to include as it was then deemed a "non-serious" accident. Now that a hull-loss has been proved, it is notable enough to include. I've re-opened the discussion at talk:Aer Arann and am going to notify the Aviation WikiProject. Mjroots (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again. If you look at the URL's the one you included in the reference, is missing _0 at the end. This is what causing the link to be dead. From my view i got to a link to 3 reports none of them about this incident. I am using Firefox 20 on Mac OSX 10.8.3. Personally i think it should go in now we have evidence the incident is notable as per WP:AIRCRASH --JetBlast (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm, not sure what happened there. It opens OK with Mozilla Firefox. Anyhow, I see that there is previous discussion on the talk page re this accident with consensus not to include as it was then deemed a "non-serious" accident. Now that a hull-loss has been proved, it is notable enough to include. I've re-opened the discussion at talk:Aer Arann and am going to notify the Aviation WikiProject. Mjroots (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Non-English sources
Hi, Jetblast! I saw an edit at Hong Kong Airlines in which your summary was "(Undid revision 542941740 by Vja1990 (talk) This is not in English, cannot be verified. For the English wikiepdia please use English sources) (undo)"
In fact non-English sources are allowed. It is that English sources are preferred. There is a crucial difference. Non-English sources can be verified by checking with a speaker of that language. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- In reality how would i find someone who can speak that language? They could be putting anything. --JetBlast (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Jetstar
Sorry JetBlast I moved Jetstar back to Jetstar Airways after a user objected , I appreciate nobody commented on your request since the end of March and I moved it in good faith but we need to resolve comments from a respected user who had not noticed the comment from March to make sure we have consensus. MilborneOne (talk) 09:15, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Swiss A330
Swiss owns 15 A330 but operates only 14 and has another 1 on order. So please stop changing this. HB-JHQ is not operated by Swiss (see your own source)!95.89.250.170 (talk) 09:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Lgcsmasamiya. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mauricio Montezuma, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks fine, Twinkle marks it as reviewed, rather annoying. Maybe we should ask them to change that? --JetBlast (talk) 15:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Aarti Shrivastava
Hello JetBlast. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Aarti Shrivastava, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a direct copyvio - text is sufficiently different. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 22:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks like it has been changed since an admin cam around to this one. The text was word for word when i tagged it. Thanks again. --JetBlast (talk) 22:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Your message at ANI
Hi, JetBlast. You a) say I'm hounding him...I'm trying to help and b) I wasn't banned. It was a simple 1 week cool-down block. Please change it. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 18:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Tweaked it, but a block and a ban is nearly the same thing anyway. --JetBlast (talk) 18:06, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- This isn't hounding. I'm doing this to a self-admitted sock and helping out with a proposed ban for the better of the Wikicommunity. I'll take your advice, but it's not Wikihounding and if so, there's a valid reason to do so, per the guideline. This isn't just some innocent user...this is a sock of a banned user and it is being dealt with. Thanks, though. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 18:10, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Its not what you are doing but the way you are going about it. Once you mature you will know. --JetBlast (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- True on the mature part. Anyway, I'm starting to lay loose and will only check in about to see what the Ckeckuser results are and the ANI result. Thanks for the advice. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 18:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Its not what you are doing but the way you are going about it. Once you mature you will know. --JetBlast (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- This isn't hounding. I'm doing this to a self-admitted sock and helping out with a proposed ban for the better of the Wikicommunity. I'll take your advice, but it's not Wikihounding and if so, there's a valid reason to do so, per the guideline. This isn't just some innocent user...this is a sock of a banned user and it is being dealt with. Thanks, though. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 18:10, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The No Spam Barnstar |
| I've seen your contribs, and you've been working really hard with the CSD of promotional articles! Well done JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 03:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
Dymna Sumish
Good afternoon) I've just created this page about the Ukrainian band. Could you help me please with this article? And what's the problem with the article? With respect --ВікіПЕДист (talk) 11:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Happy Memorial Day!
_near_Washington_DC.jpg)
WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) is wishing you a Happy Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Hi, JetBlast. Not sure if you celebrate or not, but happy Memorial Day. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 15:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am not American, its something we don't do in the UK at this time of year. Ours is the 11th November. Thanks anyway. --JetBlast (talk) 15:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Asterisk (PBX)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Sorry. I was checking by eye and I missed #12. I'll have to see if I can fix up ref 12 so it isn't a bare URL. RJFJR (talk) 01:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Non-free reduce vector images
You requested a non-free image size reduction of File:Java logo.svg, which is a vector image. What's the point? I did the reduction anyway, but I think it's pointless. --Ysangkok (talk) 10:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Nijole Gabija Wolmer
Hello JetBlast. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nijole Gabija Wolmer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi sorry about that. I did mean to click A11, must of got distracted or something. Sorry about that. --JetBlast (talk) 21:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Tampa Cargo.PNG)
Thanks for uploading File:Tampa Cargo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:AeroGal Logo.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:AeroGal Logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Adria Airways logo.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Adria Airways logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
PrabashWhat? 21:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:AeroGal Logo.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:AeroGal Logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)