User talk:Jewnicorn592

Clever, not[edit]

You must be very dedicated to harassing this person to wait four days and make ten good edits just to insult him. Thank you for your work correcting style errors. As to the rest, shape up. Danger ^{High voltage!} 05:11, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually,[edit]

He is my best friend, we wrote it together for a school Wikipedia reliability project. Though we have succeeded in proving the uptight maintenance of Wikipedia by its users, we can and WILL not guarantee the ceasing of future edits.

December 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Danger ^{High voltage!} 05:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jewnicorn592 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Aren't We Mature Jewnicorn592 (talk) 05:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Kinu ^t/_c 06:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You must be dedicated to removing as many accounts as possible that interject humor (we can and WILL not guarantee the ceasing of future edits) into their messages to other uses. If you don't like what you hear, please say so. Wikipedia isn't given a bad rep so much for its unreliability, but the abuse of control its extremely dedicated users have to staying online all day for the sake of sending messages insinuating their own superiority, and then blocking users if they are to reply.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jewnicorn592 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is an unblock request. I request someone else look at this request, as the previous moderator showed a huge lack of respect for his job, which I believe he does not deserve to hold.

Jewnicorn592 (talk) 04:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. An optimist on the run! 07:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.