User talk:Jezzy68r

January 2013[edit]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 17:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Elkman, you may be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Linlithgow Academy. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jezzy68r (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Everyone deserves a second second chance right? What is your problem!

Decline reason:

You were our problem; hence you were blocked. We've got enough vandals; find another playground. --jpgordon^{::==( o
)} 17:57, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jezzy68r (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel I have learn my lesson and understood the severity of what I have done. I promise you that I won't be a menace to your pages and warp statistics and add in inappropriate humour any more. I know now that you have enough vandals to contend with and that you have to fix up pages all the time. You can trust me to make constructive edits now. (if you unblock me) (: Jezzibel 6'ty 8'r (talk) 18:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given your continued vandalism even while awaiting review of your latest unblock request, the answer is "no". I am also removing your ability to edit this page to prevent future disruption Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vacuous and verbose promises say nothing other than the fact that you're trying to tell us what we want to hear. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're about one edit short of having your talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]