User talk:Jfry3

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Rockland, Ontario has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 00:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah...my bad - thanks for pointing that out. - Fastily (talk) 00:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shiraz Dossa[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shiraz Dossa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability not asserted

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 18:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Your recent edit to the page Coat of arms of British Columbia appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop introducing errors to coat of arms articles. I've had to revert several of your edits that are completely unsupported by the references. →ROUX ₪ 01:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop using an image in your signature, per Wikipedia:Signature#Must_not_be_used. Thanks. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi..... Do I know you? And are you referencing the above debate? Also prior to this I had not even made a automatic signature. —jfry3 (talk) 15:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this edit of yours, in which it appeared that this image was part of your signature. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 14:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I only added the image due to the content of the discussion and it is not usually part of the signature. Your concern is noted however and I appreciate your help. —jfry3 (talk) 15:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Aboriginal Based Organized Crime[edit]

Thanks for your recent edits to Aboriginal Based Organized Crime. I appreciate your assistance with this article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icedteapitcher (talk • contribs) 19:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome-- jfry3 (talk) 20:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United States order of precedence[edit]

Please read the earlier talk page discussions regarding the content you mistook as vandalism. In general, when you disagree with content that is not obvious vandalism, you should assume good faith and leave a civil edit summary. If the content you disagree with is sourced, you should check the source and not remove the content unless it isn't actually supported by the source or the source is somehow not reliable. In either of those cases, your edit summary should reflect that reasoning. As it is, removing sourced content without a valid reason makes your edit summary sort of ironic, don't you think?. Please be more careful in the future. Celestra (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, evidently I acted a little rashly. -- jfry3 (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lebanon and the United Nations[edit]

Hi, I'm SshibumXZ. Jfry3, thanks for creating Lebanon and the United Nations!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more sources if and when you get the time.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 03:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]