User talk:Jim.oloughlin
File copyright problem with File:Vibelogogif.gif[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Vibelogogif.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 00:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Loree Rackstraw[edit]
Hi Jim.oloughlin, I see that you recently created the new article Loree Rackstraw. The article looks very well put together. New articles are typically reviewed by users on the ‘New Article Patrol’. It’s nice to see you editing. Hope you’ll stick around! :) Let me know if I can be of any help and I’ll do my best! Thank you, Jipinghe (talk) 22:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
A page you started (Scott Cawelti) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Scott Cawelti, Jim.oloughlin!
Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
The page is reviewed.
To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nomination of Scott Cawelti for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Cawelti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Cawelti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)