User talk:Jim582

Welcome!

Hello, Jim582, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 19:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Jonathan Shenton[edit]

The article Jonathan Shenton has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 19:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jonathan Shenton, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. See WP:HOAX. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Sockpuppet of blocked User:Tim471. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jim582 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a sockpuppet of a User:tim471. I have absolutely no idea who this person is, i realise that my username does sound like his but i assure you that is a mere coincedence i have used this name for many years on Runescape and other online games. All i wished to do was to create a wiki article on a great man Jonathan Shenton, i am then wrongly accused of being a sock puppet, i thought that the people on here would be nice, and be helpful not accuse me of things. You could of just told me where i was going wrong on the article and i would of gladly improved it but this is not what you have done.

Decline reason:

You are quite obviously that user, given the similarity in name and in editing that page. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 20:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.