User talk:Jmplaton

Jmplaton, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Jmplaton! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright violation[edit]

In reverting my edit at View, Inc. you re-instated a major copyright violation. I have reverted it again. Please check carefully before reverting edits with clear explanations in the edit summary in future. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jmplaton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i got so frustrated with use DeniseJZ continued undo of factual corrections I inappropriately threatened legal action which I realize is not appropriate. However, neither is the behavior of user DeniseJZ. I request to be unblocked and commit to following the behavior and rules of wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Until your legal action has been completed, or your threat has been rescinded, this block will need to stand, per WP:NLT. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jmplaton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I rescind my threat of any legal action. And again point out that user DenisJZ offers no evidence of fact whereas I have taken the time and care to interview former employees and track the company's progress leading to my factual corrections. Answer from DeniseJZ: I've been doing research and helping to maintain this Wikipedia page since the beginning. It's inappropriate for a newcomer like you, Jmplaton, to show up with a hidden agenda and replace almost everything arbitrarily with biased and false information. Are you an employee or getting paid to do this?

Decline reason:

What is the relationship between you, User:Rbammi, and User:14kawadat? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"If this continues we will consider taking legal action" - please clarify whom you meant by "we". Please also explain why you thought you had legal standing in a hypothetical case involving what DenisJZ might have written about View, Inc. Huon (talk) 17:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Answer from DeniseJZ: it's clear that Jmplaton is either an employee or getting paid to do these false postings; he needs to disclose this. He's made changes that are inaccurate and unsupported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeniseJZ (talk • contribs) 18:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: This is now a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]