User talk:Jmstenborg

Speedy deletion of Cancer medicine ukrain

A tag has been placed on Cancer medicine ukrain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cenarium^Talk 10:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The website medicdebate.org is released under a creative commons license, so there is no copyright infringement Mikael Stenborg, editor of medicdebate.org

The text seems to be copied from http://www.nornia.com/?q=book/export/html/71 and http://www.proukrain.com/infophys.html and their copyright status is unknown. Maybe you should go to WP:copyright. Cenarium^Talk 11:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

If you think that Wikipedia policy supports the undeletion of this article, and the copyright holder has released the text as described at WP:COPY, then you can request undeletion at deletion review, and the community will discuss it. Recreating the talk page won't make that happen, since the community isn't watching that talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Jmstenborg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Triwbe (talk) 16:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Cancer medicine ukrain

Hi, I responded on the talk page, concerning the name of the article. Cenarium^Talk 19:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Pancreatic cancer

We have a good tradition on Wikipedia to avoid discussing phase II trials unless the results are headline-grabbing NEJM-publishingly shocking. Unless I missed this coverage, Ukrain is not quite of that calibre (otherwise Patrick Swayze would be receiving it?) Looking at your contributions to pancreatic cancer, you seem to devote a large amount of space to two very small trials with possibly interesting results that need replicating on larger studies before any guideline-producing or licensing body would dare considering a substance like Ukrain. Hope you understand. Let me know if you have any questions. JFW | T@lk 22:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I definetely think the result of these studies are headline-grabbing and that Patrick Swayze should have Ukrain. 25% 5 year survival of Pancreatic Cancer is a lot more than a few percent. You do not need big trials to demonstrate effects when the effect is big. The research on Ukrain have been sabotaged for decennias by the establishment. I agree that less space can be devoted

There are many persons trying to prevent this kind of information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmstenborg (talk • contribs)

I will respond on Talk:Pancreatic cancer where you have copied the above messages. JFW | T@lk 13:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I have asked you a few times not to reinsert your content until we have come to an agreement on Talk:Pancreatic cancer. Using UNDO without an edit summary is pretty poor form. I have now rewritten the entire section and condensed the material on Ukrain. I would suggest we leave it at that. JFW | T@lk 06:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Locomotor sensitization

A tag has been placed on Locomotor sensitization, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SMC (talk) 14:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Ukrain

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, an article you created, Ukrain, was deleted because it was a repost of material previously deleted, in this case by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrain (2nd nomination). Please see our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under general criteria. If you feel the original discussion ended improperly, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not repost the article.

We welcome your contributions at Wikipedia, but please respect what Wikipedia is not. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have questions. Thank you. KrakatoaKatie 01:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fredrick Levenson

A tag has been placed on Fredrick Levenson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DGG (talk) 02:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Ukrain/Temp

A tag has been placed on Talk:Ukrain/Temp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DGG (talk) 02:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)