User talk:JoeK2033

February 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. [1] MrOllie (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promises (2022 film) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Promises (2022 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 22:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Promises (2022 film)[edit]

Hello, JoeK2033. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Promises (2022 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naleski[edit]

Hello! That draft looks great and well-sourced. I am no expert on musician articles and what determines notability though. Red Director (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Director Thank you, I added a citation from AllMusic for his birthday. From what I could find, he's known more for his work in film and art. JoeK2033 (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would check some feedback out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film and Wikipedia:WikiProject Arts if you feel so inclined. Good luck! Red Director (talk) 12:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! JoeK2033 (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Naleski (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significant, independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Naleski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoeK2033! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:James Naleski has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Naleski. Thanks! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9, I'm continuing to look for more information on him and my next article, the second President of the Connecticut University System. I'll continue to add information as I find it. JoeK2033 (talk) 18:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Naleski (November 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

none of the awards are notable and nothing suggests this person can meet the notability guidelines. Almost all the sources are primary which cannot be used to establish notability. An acknowledgement (thanking him) by the author of a book is trivial (The Road to Success) as is Marquis Who's Who as it is not a reliable source so should not be used at all. If this is resubmitted without substantial relevant improvement meeting the above criteria, the draft is like to be rejected meaning it will no long be considered.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Naleski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, JoeK2033. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:James Naleski, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Can you please disclose your relationship to any other accounts or editors that have previously edited this draft? If you wish to be a contributor to Wikipedia, the only way to do so is to fully disclose any conflict of interest and links to previous accounts, and to commit to editing within our policies and guidelines. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93I don't have a conflict of interest as suggested. I don't know any of the other editors on the page:James Naleski JoeK2033 (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, based on your history I do not find that a plausible statement. I have blocked you from editing that particular draft, per WP:NOTPROMO. If you are interested in being a productive member of this community, please demonstrate that by working on other topics. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Draft:James Naleski) for violations of WP:NOTPROMO.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JoeK2033 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here JoeK2033 (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the problems that lead to your block. Yamla (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I ask that you please reconsider blocking me from this page as I am going to be interviewing them and would like to use some of the information that I gather and post. Additionally, I would like to cite the following: https://cslarchives.ctstatelibrary.org/repositories/2/accessions/8454.

Additionally, I wonder if I can upload photos from the Connecticut State Library and cite them? I would like to do this for several public figures in the Connecticut region. JoeK2033 (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Connecticut State University System. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. JoeK2033 (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of presidents of Connecticut State University System has been accepted[edit]

List of presidents of Connecticut State University System, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How would I add List of presidents of Connecticut State University System to be a category? JoeK2033 (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Academy of Interactive and Visual Artists moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Academy of Interactive and Visual Artists. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Article lacks in-depth independent reliable sources to establish notability.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JoeNMLC (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Moving forward, how do I work on an article in draftspace before publishing it? JoeK2033 (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]