User talk:Joe Gazz84/Archive/2010/June

El Corte River

I have recreated a basic version of this article, which could use expansion. Before nominating an article for speedy deletion, it is worth thinking about whether it has potential. In this case, clearly it has. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. Geographical bodies generally meet the basic requirement of notability, however stubby they turn out to be. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Taboo (Claudia Christian album)

Hello Joe Gazz84. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Taboo (Claudia Christian album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

-- :)HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Third Goal

An article that you have been involved in editing, Third Goal, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Goal. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Triple RRR (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Wikimaker123

Edit repeated - removal of spam. . . Mean as custard (talk) 15:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)