User talk:Joelstevenwright

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Joelstevenwright, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Novak Djokovic. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! HighInBC 02:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Rafael Nadal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Novak Djokovic with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Laber□^T 03:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just adding that the same stuff was added to the Talk:Roger Federer‎ article (it was reverted). Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
More weird nonsense at Talk:Tiger Woods. I'm not sure what you are playing at here, but a WP:BLOCK looms if it continues.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 04:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Tiger Woods for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Ok.... this was added after the other warnings were given. Learn to use the talk pages properly... this is not a forum or a blog. Talk pages are used to make your point on specific changes that will help make an article better. It is not a place to rant or use as a soapbox. Please see Help:Using talk pages if you don't understand why you are being reverted. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Talk:Roger Federer. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Wolbo (talk) 23:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Jimmy Connors. You have been warned multiple times on this issue. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Novak Djokovic, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. still doing it i see Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Novak Djokovic. Back at it again so soon? Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't someone indef this guy per WP:NOTHERE? He has gone straight from one block to the next.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the next step if they keep going. Widr (talk) 10:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin and don't want to be one, but if I was, he would have been indeffed over this per WP:NOTHERE.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Novak Djokovic. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 20:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sinclair Stevens[edit]

Don't post a false claim about someone's death, even on a talk page. That would lead to a permanent block. Ground Zero | t 14:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enough[edit]

As per the prior warnings, I've blocked this account. Talk pages are for discussing article improvements, not your personal blog for unrelated and unsourced ranting. Kuru (talk) 12:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]