User talk:Johannes Beltz

Mr Beltz, from what I can tell, you are a professional historian specializing in the Hindu religion, and you are submitting articles to Wikipedia which are based on your studies. Is this correct?

While we do appreciate your contributions, I must point out that all Wikipedia articles are licensed under the terms of the GFDL, which means that you are allowing other people to edit and modify them; some academics have, upon realizing this, chosen to refrain from further participating in the project. If this does not dissuade you, then I gladly invite you to continue with your submissions. DS 14:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I think that WIKIPEDIA is a useful tool and precious source of information. Whatever I can contribute from time to time will be with pleasure. If my articles get improved the better it is. Johannes Beltz

Nomination of Anncharlott Eschmann for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anncharlott Eschmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anncharlott Eschmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 21:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice Boner Institute (January 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 331dot were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alice Boner Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johannes Beltz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]