User talk:JohnGhan11

April 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Thom Tillis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Thom Tillis, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you requested on my talk page, I am leaving my response to your comment here. The material you added is WP:PUFFERY that is not included in articles. Also relevant is the WP:DUE policy, that explains that Wikipedia content needs to be reflective of the overall weight of sources. Please also note that per WP:BRD if your additions are reverted, you need to then discuss those additions on the article's talk page rather than simply reverting, or else that is edit warring. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JohnGhan11, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi JohnGhan11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JohnGhan11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Quisqualis (talk) 21:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]