User talk:Johnny Rose 11

Welcome. Please use this page to address any questions or concerns you have for me. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 03:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Johnny Rose 11, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Johnny Rose 11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Johnny Rose 11, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

August 2020

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sean O'Malley (fighter) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited English language in Puerto Rico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Culebra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tainan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 01:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

I didn't change the source, I simply calculated the mean temperatures correctly. According to the current calculations given, Tainan wouldn't even qualify as a tropical climate (which it is listed as) considering the mean temperature in January is listed as below 18C (64F). I've run into this issue before where the calculations are incorrect, I correct them, and then it gets reverted back to the incorrect calculations. It's a major pain, but I won't even bother with this one again if you're not going to see the light. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 02:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

if you're not going to see the light: Except there is no light to be "seen", since the CWB in the ROC, as with many other national meteorological / climatological agencies, does not use that simplistic calculation to report the mean temperature. You are welcome to read this prior discussion I and multiple others had. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 02:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Hi Johnny Rose 11. I've reverted a few of your edits that used poor or unreliable sources. I have no idea how much editing experience you had before creating this account, but please be more careful with your selection of references, especially for biographical information where high-quality sources are a requirement. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm incredibly experienced. My previous account here dates back to 2005. Unfortunately, I got locked out of it and had to create this one. Not sure what you're referring to exactly, but I always do my best to find the most reliable sources. I didn't get any revert notifications, just the notification for this message. Did you actually revert or did you just edit? Anyway, I'll continue to try to do my best... Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 02:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Strange that you didn't see the notifications. Here are the three reverts I made: [1] [2] [3] --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 04:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

I'll agree with the first revert. Last two I disagree with. Not worth getting into a revert war over, though. I'll see if I can find more "reliable sources" for the last two... Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 04:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Like I said earlier, you were correct about the first revert. With regard to the last two, I found more reliable sources. I even found updated information that showed that Joe's Stone Crab is actually the highest-grossing independent restaurant in the US and it's a very valid source. Thanks for engaging with me and giving me an impetus to find better sources. Take care. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 04:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks.

The bit about Jane March is of questionable encyclopedic value, but that's a different concern. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. Take care. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 16:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Collins, Mississippi, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

This is an unnecessarily hostile and inappropriate message to send to me. The weather box with the source for Collins having a humid subtropical climate (as does the rest of Mississippi as well as neighboring states like Alabama and Louisiana) was already in existence. It is customary to have a brief paragraph stating what the climate and typical weather is like in any given place. For you to act as if I am guilty of disruptive editing and that I may be blocked from editing is beyond ridiculous. It is you who is out of line here. YOU should be apologizing to me for this shameful stunt! I have never had another editor treat me this way and I've been editing Wikipedia for 15 years. Unfortunately, I lost access to my old account, but I am an experienced editor who makes a good faith effort to do his best. If you wanted to revert my edit, fine, but don't treat me this way as if I am acting maliciously or doing something out of the ordinary.

Mississippi has a humid subtropical climate with long, hot and humid summers, and short, mild winters.

Mississippi#Climate Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 19:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Vinnie Johnson . Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hipal (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

You do realize that the version you reverted to literally isn't even sourced, right? At least I made an effort to find a source, one that has its own Wikipedia entry. Best source I could find. What sounds more plausible to you. That Vinnie Johnson served as a color commentator in 1990, 1991 and 1992, even though he was still an active NBA player and in his last season he wasn't even in Detroit, he was playing in SAN ANTONIO, which is FAR away from Detroit. Or as I stated and sourced, he became a color commentator AFTER his playing career was over? It's literally impossible to play in a game and do color commentary at the same time! I'm doing my best to correct obvious misinformation and find valid sources while making good faith edits. Hopefully you can realize that. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 21:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

All I did is remove yet another unreliable source that is listed in WP:RSP added to a BLP by you. Please be far more careful. --Hipal (talk) 17:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Effectively this adds up to another editor being allowed to post something unsourced that is literally impossible and illogical (you can't color commentate in the stands while playing in the game at the same time), yet when I source something that states the obvious, that Johnson became a color commentator AFTER his playing career is over, you revert it because you don't like the source. So misinformation without a source is allowed to stay up, but my common sense correction with a source is disallowed. Fantastic! Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

If there are other problems in the article, fix them. This is a WP:BLP, so if there's anything that is not verified by a high-quality reference, it should be removed. --Hipal (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 08:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

I glanced over the article, and my impression is that it either needs severe trimming or many more refs. It should not stay as it is. --Hipal (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Sounds good. I already removed the "color analyst" sentence. I'm sure you'll be able to improve the article, assuming you plan on working on it yourself. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

New account

Hi, welcome back to Wikipedia! You indicated above that you had an account here for 15 years before getting "locked out" of that one and creating this new account. It may be a good idea to write on your userpage what the name of your previous account was to avoid confusion about your situation. You can read through WP:VALIDALT for more information. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

You're aware that source citations are required. Why don't you use them?

On Long-term nonprogressor, you added apparent original research to Wikipedia. If a source has stated what you added, you need to cite the source. This, plus your failure to use edit summaries, has been a problem for you on other occasions. Therefore, the strongest warning is being applied. If your last account was blocked for this violation, then you know what comes next.
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Apologies for that silly mistake.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! --Quisqualis (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

You're being ridiculous. I didn't vandalize or do original research or any other nonsense like that. I fixed a grammatical error. That's all. I'll put that in the edit summary since apparently that's so hard for you to surmise for some reason. But YOU are the one being ridiculous here, NOT me. Johnny Rose 11 (talk)!

Apologies, as I edited in haste.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

I appreciate the apology and it is accepted. However, I hope this will be a learning moment for you. I've noticed that lately, people jump right off the bat with the histrionic responses where they assume the worst intentions. It didn't used to be like that here.

Now, on my end, I will try to add edit summaries more often. It wasn't an issue in the past, so I didn't always do them, but now that I'm aware that it's an issue, I will address it. So I suppose we BOTH learned something here. Take care. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 02:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dustin Poirier, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 22:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Provincetown, Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fixer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Your change to Killing of Ahmaud Arbery

The name on the sign doesn't have a comma between the city and state. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 23:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

That may be the case, but it's still proper to edit it accordingly because that's the correct stylizing. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 02:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

OK. (error in the original) Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 03:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

I used the same source and information from the source that was cited, I simply added some information from that source that hadn't been used, and I also corrected the date for the article. The article cited contains the information that Hill's 6 children range in age from 2 to 14, so I included that information. The user who cited that article also put in the wrong date, which I corrected. I didn't do anything wrong and I actually improved the article with more concise information and corrected a mistake in citation of the article. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 06:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Rose 11, I have checked the source and indeed the source did indicated in small print your claim. My apologies - all mistakes is mine. You are welcome to add back the info. Stay safe. Cassiopeia talk 06:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

No worries. Stay safe as well. Take care! Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 06:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm KyleJoan. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Taron Egerton in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. These edits expanded materials, going far beyond simple "wording" changes. Please summarize more accurately in the future. KyleJoan^talk 19:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

If you look at the source that was already used as a citation, there's a picture that shows Egerton singing while John plays piano. Source: https://ew.com/movies/2019/11/03/rocketman-taron-egerton-drag-name-elton-john/ I don't think describing him as a singer as well as actor or accurately describing their performances together is out of line. Egerton is a singer and when he and Elton perform together, he sings while Elton plays the piano. Here's another example of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzWSEtahHus I'm not sure what terminology I was supposed to use to describe the changes I made. It was the same information as already sourced. Reflecting that Egerton is a singer and not just an actor is a wording change. But if you have some suggestions on how to describe it better, I'm open to that...Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Please use to the article's talk page to ask more users since you didn't seem to understand my message and edit summary. KyleJoan^talk 21:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. Take care. Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 03:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)