User talk:Johnsopc

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Johnsopc/Graham Brightwell has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Brightwell, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 01:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Brightwell. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Brightwell. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 12:34, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Brightwell. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 12:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How are the websites of major universities unreliable sources ? (I m guessing your complaint is not about the respective Othello Federations, as it doesn t really get any more official.) Also it seems compared to the wiki page of say Fred Diamond for instance, my article is rather well founded in objective third party sources ?

They aren't unreliable, but not independent. Regards, mabdul 15:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Brightwell. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 15:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok, would you mind having a look at the wikipedia entrys for Fred Diamond or Damiano Brigo for instance ? It s just that I struggle to see how my article has been backed up by worse sources ? Also, how is a major university not an independent body ? Also, except for the LSE link none of the sources I have used have an affiliation with Graham Brightwell, should I just remove the LSE link then ? I have also added 2 more independent source (Springer and ACM) regarding his publications and affiliation. Thanks for your help.

Johnsopc (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Graham Brightwell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 20:53, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fred Diamond, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Princeton and Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Golden triangle[edit]

Could I ask you please to stop reverting at that article? Looking at your logged-in and logged-out edits, you're close to violating our 3RR rule, which you can see at WP:3RR. There are sourcing, formatting, and neutrality problems with your edits, and it would be appreciated if you would discuss them on talk. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have a neutrality issue, please see my remarks on the relevant talk page... Hypatia (talk) 00:51, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 01:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Golden triangle (English universities). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wifione ^Message 01:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fred Diamond for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred Diamond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Diamond until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.