User talk:Jolanak

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jolanak! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jojhutton (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Guttenberg[edit]

Please revert this edit. You have added unsourced information to the article. Cs32en Talk to me 19:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. I have not added unsourced information to the article, on the contrary I have cited numerous sources on the talk page and elsewhere referring to him as a Baron. You have added untrue and unsourced information that contradicts the sources that are cited. Jolanak (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Which of the sources that you have given contains any assertion that Guttenberg would be frequently referred to as "Baron"? Cs32en Talk to me 19:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frequently does not say anything else than "significantly more than one". I can cite hundreds of examples. "Occasionally" is untrue. Jolanak (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think many people will agree with your definition of "frequently" as meaning "significantly more than one". Cs32en Talk to me 19:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think they will. Jolanak (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't! --TraceyR (talk) 15:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Time to leave the sinking ship?[edit]

Süddeutsche Zeitung heute

Peter Häberle zu Plagiatsaffäre

Doktorvater revidiert Urteil über Guttenberg

28.02.2011, 17:12 2011-02-28 17:12:18

Guttenbergs Doktorvater Peter Häberle äußert sich zur Plagiatsaffäre und geht mit seinem ehemaligen Doktoranden hart ins Gericht. Die Mängel in Guttenbergs Dissertation bezeichnete er als "schwerwiegend und nicht akzeptabel". Die Erklärung des Jura-Professors im Wortlaut.

Peter Häberle ist emeritierter Professor für Staatsrecht an der Universität Bayreuth. Mit einer am Montag verbreiteten Stellungnahme erklärt sich der Doktorvater Karl-Theodor zu Guttenbergs zum Plagiatsfall.

Die Erklärung des Jura-Professors Peter Häberle im Wortlaut:

"Mit sehr großem Bedauern habe ich zur Kenntnis nehmen müssen, dass die Umstände der von mir betreuten Promotion von Herrn K.-T. zu Guttenberg den Ruf der Universität Bayreuth in der öffentlichen Diskussion in Misskredit zu bringen geeignet sind. Die in der Promotionsschrift von Herrn zu Guttenberg entdeckten, mir unvorstellbaren Mängel sind schwerwiegend und nicht akzeptabel. Sie widersprechen dem, was ich als gute wissenschaftliche Praxis seit Jahrzehnten vorzuleben und auch gegenüber meinen Doktoranden zu vermitteln bemüht war.

Die Aberkennung des Doktortitels war die notwendige Folge. In meiner ersten spontanen und letztlich zu vorschnellen Reaktion konnte ich - ohne Detailkenntnis der konkreten Vorwürfe - das Ausmaß nicht absehen. Im Blick auf die Originalität der Fragestellung und die Intensität der inhaltlichen Ausarbeitung hielt ich jede Form eines Vorwurfs für ausgeschlossen - zumal Herr zu Guttenberg stets zu meinen besten Seminarstudenten gehörte. Ich habe den Werdegang seiner Arbeit, wie bei all meinen Doktoranden ohne jede äußere Beeinflussung nach besten Kräften betreut. Ich werde auch weiterhin als Wissenschaftler alles mir Mögliche zur erforderlichen Aufklärung der Umstände durch die Gremien der Universität beitragen."

Just a short notice about Wk[edit]

Observing your edits, I got the impression that you are always pushing to defend zu Guttenberg. There is nothing wrong in liking him, and I know that you are new here, I just want to note that the spirit here in the English Wikipedia is towards a neutral point-of-view. Please take that into account in the future.

I have never met him, so I wouldn't know if I like him. Jolanak (talk) 21:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mensdorff-Pouilly has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Mensdorff-Pouilly has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]