User talk:Joolzm

This is Joolzm's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raoul A. Cortez (June 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject of the article may be notable. However, there are unreferenced paragraphs and too many unsourced claims for the article to be accepted. Inline citations to reliable sources should be added or unverifiable information should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raoul A. Cortez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joolzm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Joolzm/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:Joolzm/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 20:56, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raoul A. Cortez has been accepted[edit]

Raoul A. Cortez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, thank you so much! Didn't expect this! Thanks also for the cleaning up you have done. I will definitely work on improving it even more. Joolzm (talk) 17:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joolzm/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joolzm/sandbox. Thanks! Star Mississippi 14:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was fast! Thanks for letting me know about the external links - I had no idea. Joolzm (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for quickly addressing the issue. You've done significant work to improve it since the fall. Well done! Star Mississippi 16:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Guillermo Nicolas has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Guillermo Nicolas. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for letting me know about the link/citation issue. There are several items in the text that I wanted to add links to, but nothing was availaible for them in Wikipedia, so I attached external links instead (the Alameda theater is one example). I was then asked to remove them from the body of the text, which I did, putting them at the end instead. If I understand correctly, citations will only be allowed if they mention the article subject (Guillermo Nicolas), and external links in the body of the text are forbidden, is that correct? When are external links allowed? Thanking you again. Joolzm (talk) 13:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Joolzm

You've misunderstood the difference between reliable sources about Nicolas and his work and external links. Sourcing would be things like journals, newspapers written in depth. Links would be things like like theater's website. Some could work as sourcing, such as an event listing but that's less likely. Let me know if it's helpful? Star Mississippi 14:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. So if I find the theater's website, where can I put that as a link? Joolzm (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not needed. We know from the sourcing for whom the media center was named. More links are not necessarily better. You've added good quality (thank you), but not everything needs to be linked. If someone writes an article about the theater, it can be linked. Star Mississippi 14:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've finally got it. Thanks! Joolzm (talk) 16:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]