Joshw26[edit]

Well, i believe I'll experiement with this site, even though college guys can't use it 4 research. My new web site will be up soon at http://www.halfabrain.com

Life is partially fair.[edit]

Life is partially fair. Take example for second grade. You probably got an answer right, and got a lolly pop. I'll comment more later. I'm bored at the moment...

Joshw26's Comment Page[edit]

Have you ever heard the momisms or dadisms like, "Life isn't fair"? Well some of it is. Like when you were in second grade. You completed a page and you got a lolly pop. That's my comment for the day...or week...or month....ahh I dunno next time ill edit....

Harry Potter[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Harry Potter page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. This is not a chat site, so please do not add comment to articles. Do you think they'd look like they do if that's what people did? Hope to see you making lovely, helpful edits in the future. :-) Skittle 22:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not disrupt Wikipedia, even for schoolwork. It undermines the work people put in. And there isn't anything at the website you put yet, only ads. Just so you know, if I notice you have made these sort of disruptive edits again, I will issue a final warning because you seem to be fully aware of what you are doing and deliberately pushing the boundaries. If you vandalise articles after that, I will request that this account be blocked, if only temporarily, which will prevent you from editing articles. If you want to continue editing articles, please stop doing this. Thank you. Skittle 22:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, it is not accurate to say that Wikipedia is rarely accurate. It would be more true to say that Wikipedia articles are sometimes inaccurate. Secondly, you do not need to test it. And if you did, there are ways to test without vandalising the articles yourself. All you are doing is using up people's time in reverting your edits when they could be doing other things to improve the encyclopedia. Why not pick a few articles at random and look at their history (in the 'history' tab)? Compare different versions and see how long any vandalism on them remained. That way, you don't have to be spoiling people's work. Skittle 12:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rat Testing[edit]

A tag has been placed on Rat Testing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]