User talk:Josve05a/Archives/2014/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikidata weekly summary #124

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · John F. Lewis 00:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-36

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

  • You can now test a new Beta Feature to see links to other wikis in the sidebar. The links come from Wikidata. [1] [2]
  • You can now search pages that link to a page. Use the linksto: keyword in your search. [3] [4]
  • A redirect to a section now changes the URL in the address bar of your browser. If "Dog" redirects to "Animals#Dog", you now see "Animals#Dog" instead of "Dog#Dog". [5] [6]
  • If you are testing Flow, you now have a Flow tab in your Notifications. It is called "Messages". [7]

VisualEditor news

  • You can no longer delete required fields in templates. [8]
  • We fixed many Internet Explorer bugs. If you use Internet Explorer 11, you will get VisualEditor next week. Support for earlier versions is coming next. [9] [10] [11]
  • VisualEditor now looks better in Monobook. [12]
  • We fixed a bug where some of your typing could be undone when you used "cut" (Ctrl+X). [13]
  • You will no longer see empty or deleted categories among the suggestions when you add a category. [14]

Future software changes

  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf19) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since August 28. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 2, and on all Wikipedias on September 4 (calendar).
  • There is a proposal to build a database on Commons for file data. It will make it easier to see the author, license and topics. You can give feedback on this idea. You can also come to the IRC chat on September 3 at 18:00 (UTC) in #wikimedia-office at freenode. [15]
  • You can give feedback on Media Viewer until September 7. You can say what needs to be improved and ask other people to give feedback too. [16]
  • You can test a new version of the tool to show math. It uses MathML. Report bugs in bugzilla.
  • You will no longer be able to upload images from the mobile site. [17]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

07:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

Tech News: 2014-37

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

VisualEditor news

  • From Thursday, Internet Explorer 11 users will get VisualEditor. Support for earlier versions is coming next. [18] [19] [20]

Future software changes

  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf20) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since September 4. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 9, and on all Wikipedias on September 11 (calendar).
  • You will soon confirm a "Thanks" inline instead of in a dialog. [21]
  • You can read more about the plan to move to Phabricator, a tool that will help people develop the MediaWiki software and report bugs. [22]

Problems

  • There were problems with JavaScript and CSS on Friday, September 5 because of a code error.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

09:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Accused of copyright violation when in fact not

Why have I been accused of a copyright violation? I wrote the article myself and did not copy anyone else.. If you are going to accuse me, then why will you not at least have the decency to point out what you thought was a copyright violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vyoufinder (talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

What is all this crap? Can't Wikipedia create a site that uses english or another language? Ridiculous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vyoufinder (talk • contribs) 16:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi Vyoufinder. Your contribution appears to be a closely paraphrased extract from a third party website. Wikipedia does not permit the use of such material per the policy policy explained here. You are welcome to contribute material written in your own words that is correctly sourced to independent reliable sources. Thanks.  Philg88 ♦talk 16:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

One of your sandboxes

FYI, the primary editor of this page in your user space User:Josve05a/Alone has been blocked as the most recent reincarnation of a serial sock puppeteer. [23] -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Request on 20:35:02, 8 September 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Pink Floyd 110



Pink Floyd 110 (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Request on 15:48:38, 11 September 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Leonid2



Leonid2 (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


My page was declined, another received no help, and I received no answers to my questions.

Please respond.

Leonid2

Request on 16:11:31, 11 September 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Leonid2


I need help to move my page Knowledge Instinct from sandbox to Wiki main. I received an approval of the page but no help about the next step.

On my other page Dynamic Logic I received a suggestion to place it it on another page. I replied, why the suggestion is invalid. I do not here since then.

Leonid2

Leonid2 (talk) 16:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

why was my submission declined — Preceding unsigned comment added by 25rahul (talk • contribs) 12:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

need help from a great writer josve05a

Hi, josve05a I am a new writer on wikipedia who is getting inspired by you day by day.and in other word who is trying to be just like you. I have been talking about you in my friend circle about how you did 500+ upload on wikipedia. and by the way great profile pic. i would really really hope you would guide me .Thank you

Yours faithfully (pompeyompeypearson872) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pompeyompeypearson872 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #125

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · John F. Lewis 18:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Designing my page

Hi there I really want to design a page about my business bait about it the history, the idea behind it and what we offer and as it grows also grow the page is there a wiki guide for idiots lol that would make it easy to design a nice page with good content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buskie (talk • contribs) 20:47, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

AfC vs. AfD question

Hi,

I saw that you recreated Kanban Tool via an AfC. I'm fuzzy on the relationship between AfC, deletion review, and other sorts of relevant processes, but could you clarify why it was recreated when it had been deleted by AfD a little more than two months prior? (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanban Tool). Thanks. --— Rhododendrites talk |  05:55, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Rhododendrites, Josve didn't recreate the article, he only approved it at AfC. AfC is a process by which relatively new editors can create articles and get feedback. Has nothing to do with any deletion process. Article was deleted at AfD previously for lack of references. The old article essentially had one good ref. The new article has a ton of references. However, I haven't looked at them to see if it is enough to pass GNG now. It isn't obvious to someone that a previous AfD has happened, so Josve probably missed it.
Josve, the article has three red warning in the ref section that need to be cleaned up. Should have been done before accepting the AfC. Bgwhite (talk) 07:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Bgwhite & Josve05a - Thanks for the clarification. I really do need to spend more time around AfC to get more familiar with it.
The reason it raised a red flag for me is a few months ago a couple of us noticed a whole lot of articles about Kanban and related topics that appeared to be promotional, many not notable, usually deprodded or otherwise defended by SPAs and people with clear COI issues. So I'm admittedly a little more cynical than I would be otherwise.
I'm looking at the refs now and seeing some familiar ones. The Raju ref, which is duplicated in the list, is a couple sentences of promotional copy in a list of 15 on a website of generally dubious reliability; everything by David Anderson is self-published; Mead is again a small item in a longer list; Moran is self-published but borderline; [I don't have access to these Startup Magazine or Linux Magazine], the Shore Labs refs are written by this company; Github is certainly not a reliable source; [Gibson is another I don't have access to]; Noorani et al. links to Kanban Tool with a referral link (e.g. they're paid for mentioning it); Liles is a primary source (interview); Marczak appears to just be a list.
This doesn't, to me, appear to have solved the issues of the previous one to any noticeable degree. There are a few I don't have access to, of course.
Apologies for using your talk page to discuss the article refs in such detail. It feels more appropriate to discuss it with you first rather than taking it to the article or AfD. --— Rhododendrites talk |  15:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Nominate it for AfD if you want, I review so many AfC's, I don't even remember this one. Currently I'm on a small wikibreak working for the Swedish Social Democratic Party and the Swedish Social Democratic Youth League with the Swedish general election that is holing place today and night. So, I am a little in-active currently, my apologies! Thank you BTW Bgwhite for stalking my talk page. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Rhododendrites, the article can be nominated for speed deletion via G4, recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. However, I'd personally deny it as the article had significantly changed and fixed the problem for which it was deleted. You make a credible case for AfD again. Go with your instincts. Bgwhite (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-38

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

  • You can now change the style of links to disambiguation pages. This is done with the mw-disambig CSS class. [24] [25]
  • There was a problem on right-to-left wikis with Wikidata log entries. The text was messy in watchlists and recent changes. The problem is now fixed. The same problem will be fixed soon for user names. [26] [27] [28]
  • New users are randomly chosen for a test on 12 Wikipedias. They get messages with ideas of articles to edit. The ideas come from what they have already edited. [29]

Problems

  • There was a problem with loading images on September 10. [30]

VisualEditor news

  • If you don't select text when you add a link, the link now shows a number. [31]
  • The citation tool no longer offers to reuse a citation if there are none on the page yet. [32] [33]
  • You can now use help buttons in the "Page settings" menu to see what the options are for. [34]

Future software changes

  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf21) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since September 11. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 16, and on all Wikipedias on September 18 (calendar).
  • These changes are coming with the new version:
    • If you use Internet Explorer 7, JavaScript will no longer work. JavaScript tools and scripts will no longer work in that browser. You should update to a newer browser. [35] [36] [37]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

08:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Request on 16:27:24, 17 September 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Vincentdylan


Hello, Josve05a, you recently declined my article on a book called "First Genesis ...Complete (book)". I think this must have been done last night. I was very surprised that it got reviewed so quickly as it said that it would take a month. I wondered what your reasoning was so that I can better improve the article in hopes that it will be accepted. Did I do something incorrectly? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. Thank you.Vincentdylan (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Vincentdylan (I am not sure if I signed my post correctly)

Vincentdylan (talk) 16:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello Vincentdylan, I will try to explain this as best as I can.
So it hasn't been reviewed, I just "moved the review-box" to the right draft/submission-page.
If you need anymore help, just ask! (t) Josve05a (c) 17:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

Julian Assange

Hi there, as a recent editor of the page in question, you may wish to contribute to the discussions: ==Merge discussion for Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority ==

An article that you have been involved in editing, Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. prat (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC) prat (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-39

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes

Problems

  • There was a problem on the English Wikipedia on September 19. It was due to edits on a template used on many pages.
  • Sites were down for users in the Pacific area around 7:00 UTC on September 20. It was due to a problem in the San Francisco data center.
  • There were two bad bugs messing up articles in some browsers in VisualEditor. We fixed the bugs and updated the sites. [39] [40]

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf22) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since September 18. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 23, and on all Wikipedias on September 25 (calendar).
  • If you have more than 2000 notifications, the oldest ones will be removed.[41] [42]
  • In the "Vector" skin, the icon used for users will show a neutral gender. [43] [44]
  • The VisualEditor template tool now tells you if a required field is missing. [45]
  • The "Cancel" button of the VisualEditor save window is now called "Resume editing". This shows that you can still edit and you won't lose your changes. [46]
  • There are new keyboard shortcuts in VisualEditor. Use Ctrl+Shift+6 for code and Ctrl+Shift+5 for strikethrough. [47] [48]
  • In VisualEditor, you can now see that you are switching to the source editing mode. Before, it was not clear it was happening. [49]

Future site changes

  • You can see a plan for the move to Phabricator. It's the new tool to track bugs. A guided tour will be done via video on September 24. [50]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

09:04, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

03:02:53, 25 September 2014 review of submission by Toddlaw


Hi, I revised the article to include multiple references, as recommended by the reviewer.

I also improved the case for notability of the subject, in several ways. I listed more of his works, and also provided evidence that one of his books has been on a best seller for over 80 weeks.

Please re-consider the submission.

Sincerely, Todd Law

Toddlaw (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Josve05a/Archives/2014/September&oldid=1064408191"