User talk:Jozue1

Welcome...

Hello, Jozue1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dewster^{_^*'_} 15:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use of diacritics[edit]

Hi Jozue1,

Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like wokring on Wikipedia and look forward to more contributions from you.

However I would request you to exercise caution while adding diacritics to proper names in Wikipedia. It is not a standard practice in English. And diacritics should only be used if they are used frequently. Please see what Wikipedia:Manual of Style has to say about this:

The use of diacritics (accent marks) on foreign words is neither encouraged nor discouraged; their usage depends on whether they appear in verifiable reliable sources and on the constraints imposed by specialized Wikipedia guidelines.

As far as I know accent marks are not commonly used in Konkani(roman script). At least not according to the standardised version propogated by TSKK. Please feel free to contact me regarding this (or any other issue) :-). --Deepak D'Souza 04:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goa Velha[edit]

Hi, w.r.t. your recent edits to Goa Velha, I have some clarifications. Is Velha Goa really different from Goa Velha? As far as i know, Vhela means "Old" in Portuguese and not "Greater". I have encoutered the term Old Goa a lot but never come acorss Greater Goa or Larger goa or anything like that. Pleas elet me know if you have any relaible sources.--Deepak D'Souza 05:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deu boro dis dium/ Hello/ Nomoskar,

Yes, Goa Velha and Velha Goa are different places. Vhoddlem Gõi ie. Goa Velha (pronounced Gôa Velia [in Romi Konknnim script]) is slightly north of Pilar. You may have heard about Pilar, where Venerable Padre Agnelo Gustavo de Souza's remains are kept. 20th November was his feast day.

Velha Goa (Pornnem Gõi, Adlem Gõy, Goem or Old Goa) is the place where S. Francisco Xavier's relics are kept. His feast is on the 3rd December. Bom Jezu basillica, Sé catedral are located here. There is a post office in the catedral complex. It is written on it Velha Goa.

Velha is old in portuguese. Grande in portuguese, is large and could be greater. Probably not everything is literally translated, into other languages, from Konkannim.

There is a book written by A B de Meneses Bragança, named Etnografia da India.

Jozue1 (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're Back!![edit]

Hi, good to see you editing again. Would like you to take a look at this discussion aboth Old Goa etc taking place at the India discussion board [1] --Deepak D'Souza 04:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Agnelo de Souza[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Agnelo de Souza, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.goacom.com/culture/religion/fragnelo/pilm1.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Agnelo de Souza and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Agnelo de Souza, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Agnelo de Souza with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Agnelo de Souza. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Agnelo de Souza saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Algébrico (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Se Catedral, Goenchi Katedral, Velha Goa.JPG[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Se Catedral, Goenchi Katedral, Velha Goa.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Jozue1. You have new messages at Talk:Apparition of Our Lady at Batim.
Message added 15:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 15:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apparition of Our Lady at Batim for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apparition of Our Lady at Batim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apparition of Our Lady at Batim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoelWhy (talk) 16:58, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]