User talk:Jrphayes/Archive Jun 2007

Ratings

Why did you take the table off the BB8 page? It would have been so useful- can you reinstate it, so I can add yesterday's ratings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.48.235 (talk) 13:25, 4 June, 2007 (UTC)

Fact tags on Big Brother 2007 (UK)

Hi Jrphayes. Please don't just revert if there is one part of an edit you do not agree with. I removed some 25 {{fact}} tags that did not need to be in the article, if one that was removed should be in there, please restore it manually rather than reverting the entire edit. Thanks. Neil ╦ 11:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Alleycats

Hi John, thanks for your response. I too considered an AFD, however it does seem notable enough within the Malaysian music scene to be on Wikipedia. However, my fervor about the article is because this person is putting in personal vanity and other material that does not belong on a Wikipedia page. Guroadrunner 16:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your User Page

Hi, the majority of the markup I'm using at the moment is copied from somewhere else (your page in this case) and then modified 'til it's how I want it. And yeah, referencing was another new one for me :) Yohan euan o4 13:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Weekly summary on Big Brother 2007 (UK)

Thanks for the comment, and I apologise for doing it wrong, but I'll make sure to do this in the future.Babygurl1853 17:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

If you can suggest an appropriate place to put information regarding the kiss, could you please let me know, as i do feel that it is an important part in Big Brother history, and shouldn't be disregarded merely because it doesn't fit under any of the current headings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babygurl1853 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC

Indenting

I've got no problem with you indenting my comment. Darrenhusted 12:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Trivia

Hi J R Phayes,

Please tell me what makes you an authority on big brother 8 (UK series)topic.

Are you employed by Channel 4? What qualifications do you have in English Grammar or journalism? Surely deciding whether a fact is trivia or not is a matter of opinion. I thought the whole purpose of an encyclopedia was to provide points of trivia, hence by using this website one can improve their chances of winning trivial pursuit. If anything what could arouse more points of trivia than the infamous Big Brother. I await your reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hotavenger (talk • contribs) 10:52, 19 June, 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your speedy reply. Are you employed by Wikipedia or do you have infinite free time on your hands? Also thanks for the info about signing at the end. Today I learnt a new word "tildes" I hope this is correct. Hotavenger 11:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I upset you before by enquiring if you were employed by CH4, I was only asking. As for your English qualifications are you sure you're not a professor since your vernacular skills are mightily impressive.Hotavenger 13:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Big Brother 2007 (UK), you will be blocked from editing. Thw1309 21:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC) (please stop)
I am sorry to have misunderstood your intentions. I only saw, that a well referenced information of encyclopecic content was deliberately removed from the article . (therefore this form) I have to confess that was not so much interrested in this special information to search the whole article. Without knowing, that this information was repeated for several times, I simply misunderstood your summary. --Thw1309 06:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Big Brother 2007 (UK)

I apologise if my edits appeared to be controversial, but they were valid. I will research the subject and if it comes out in the tabloids, be sure to notify me, if not, I will notify you. Ryannus 23:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it was potentially libellous. It said that the claims were "as of yet, unsubstantiated". Anyway, I'll keep that in mind. Ryannus 23:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

thanks for cleaning up after me

Thanks for fixing the mess I left behind on the Manhunt 2 article. It had been so badly edited I missed that bit, such is the nature of the drama queens that are flocking to the article armed with their POV and incorrect facts!--The internet is serious business 13:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

BB Vandal

Thanks, just trying to stop his fun. I have to go out now though, I have requested a block for the IP and added the IP to the semi-protect request as evidence, I know it's tedious but if you could keep an eye on the IP's contribs I'd appreiciate it. Darrenhusted 13:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Page has been SP, so crisis averted. Darrenhusted 13:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)