User talk:Jrseaus

“ One person at a time, one article at a time ”

Topical Archives: Deletion reform, Journals, Speedies, IPC & Fiction, Notability ,WP:Academic things & people,
General Archives: Sept-Dec06, Jan-Feb07, Mar-Apr07, May07, Jun07, Jul 7, Aug07, Sep07, Oct 07; Nov 07, Dec07,Jan08, Feb08, Mar08, Apr08, May08, Jun08, Jul08, Aug08, Sep08, Oct08,

(some still current material from these pages is below:) :

Please post messages at the bottom of the page - I will reply on this page, unless you ask otherwise

---

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Erotographomania

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Erotographomania, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 22:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I've suggested that it should be copied to Wiktionary, as it is a dictionary definition. I've removed your signature, as signatures should not be added to articles. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 22:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Minor edits

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 23:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Power-control theory, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl?alpha=P. As a copyright violation, Power-control theory appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Power-control theory has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Power-control theory and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Power-control theory with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Power-control theory.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 23:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

The hangon template

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article, Microgloma. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 23:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Nonsense of Blood viscosity

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Blood viscosity, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Blood viscosity provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Blood viscosity, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

It does not seem like the proper tag was placed. Emeseee (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ronald Kantowski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.    SIS  23:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Larry Biittner. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.    SIS  23:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Dangle. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.    SIS  23:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Teaching strategy

A tag has been placed on Teaching strategy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.    SIS  23:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Strikeout Sister. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 23:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Whoa, slow down a little. I wouldn't call that edit to my Talk page vandalism.    SIS  23:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jrseaus for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.    SIS  00:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)