User talk:Juan M.S. Arteaga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Juan M.S. Arteaga, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 12:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit to add content to articles and avoid promoting your own work. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Vsmith (talk) 12:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, Juan M.S. Arteaga. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added. 

MrOllie (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Scientific racism. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 21:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Juan M.S. Arteaga. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. El_C 22:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk page duplication[edit]

Please do not duplicate the same (lengthy) section in multiple article talk pages — that is inappropriate. El_C 23:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not restore the same section across multiple articles. That is spamming, which you will be sanctioned for. El_C 00:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice. First of all, please sign your messages on talk pages properly; not doing so means a bot has to come by and do it, which can lead to edit conflicts, etc. Four tildes please. Second, don't pick a fight with El C. They're an administrator and they know what they are talking about. Third, making the same argument on multiple talk pages is indeed unhelpful: it means that different discussions on the same content are held in different places. The question also is why the same content should be placed in different articles--Racism in Brazil seems like the best fit to me, but that's by the by. Finally, please avoid language like "banned" and talking in all-caps. It antagonizes people needlessly. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Mr. Drmies, I appreciate your good manners and your respectful way to addressing to other editors, which unfortunately are not present neither in El C nor in Mr.Ollie. I suggest both of them get inspired by your way of addressing new editors and abandon their arrogant manners. So, please let me understand: if in order to ask for a third opinion, the issue needs to be discussed on the discussion page, but an administrator systematically removes the content for discussion so you cannot defend your claims, what should I do? Please let me know. Thanks a lot.([Juan M.S. Arteaga])(talk)
  • Please don't describe my "manners" as "arrogant." I have treated you politely and with respect. You simply refuse to listen, but that is not on me. El_C 01:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Your ways are arrogant indeed. Instead of answering my questions to your first claim in your talk-page, considering my arguments, you just repeated your first claim. And instead of letting the possibility of a reply you finish your sentence with " Full stop". You can learn a lot from Drmies. He/she is polite, even when he/she disagrees he/she tries to give some reasons for that. You are arrogant.  
  • I object to your attack. Your approach is too aggressive and you need to tone it down if you wish to remain an editor in good standing here. El_C 01:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just so we're clear, Juan M.S. Arteaga, that is not a request. I am instructing you to adhere to Wikipedia's policy against personal attacks — if you contravene it again, you will be sanctioned without further warning. Please do better. El_C 01:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thats funny. Now you menace me with sanctions. Thank you, you are just proving I am right... Best regards [[Juan M.S,Arteaga]]
  • Juan M.S. Arteaga, the content you wish to have in the article is still there on the one talk page where discussion was taking place. It is also still in the history of the article--experienced editors will know where to look. If the talk page discussion does not progress, a notification on a WikiProject talk page is usually a useful thing to do--they are listed on top of the article talk page. If you go there, you can place a note on the WikiProject's talk page, telling interested editors where they might go for that discussion. The point is also to centralize discussion, and that is why El C chose to remove it from the one talk page. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, the moment you disengage from that exchange with El C will be a good moment. Nothing good can come from that. Just drop the subject and move on to work on content. [edit conflict: I see this comes too late.] Drmies (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you Mr Drmies. Your comments are very helpful and give me some hope that it is still worthy trying to edit and contribute to wikipedia. As you can see, instead of giving me good reasons and answering my questions El C has decided that better that just menace me it is better to sanction me, so he blocked me for editing for one day... Of course he is not arrogant at all... I hope most of Wikipedia editors doesn't behave like him. He could learn a lot from you one, May be one day he learns to argue with reasons and dialogue instead of impositions, menacing and denying the possibility of reply and defence. Thank you a lot [[Juan M.S,Arteaga]]
  • You are welcome to defend your arguments, seek clarifications —ones which are pertinent and responsive, though— as well as appeal your block. What you cannot do, however, is continue to personally attack, myself or any other Wikipedia editor. That is strictly prohibited. El_C 02:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course he is not arrogant at all... Juan M.S,Arteaga, if you continue with the personal attacks, your access to editing this very talk page will be revoked. El_C 02:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you ignored Drmies suggestion and continued to attack El C. That was a bad idea. How many Administrators are you going to ignore? You've had 4 post to your talk page in a short period of time concerned about your edits. Doug Weller talk 05:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sanction[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 02:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked[edit]

Juan M.S. Arteaga, I am an uninvolved administrator — you cannot wish me away. And you cannot call me a "tyrant." I will continue to ensure that you behave in a respectful manner with other Wikipedia editors. If you are unable to comport yourself with due moderation, then perhaps this simply isn't the project for you. El_C 02:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One week block[edit]

See you in a week, Juan M.S. Arteaga. If, at that time, you find yourself still unable to refrain from personal attacks, the next block is likely to be of an indefinite duration. Please try to do better. El_C 11:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, just in the interest of proper procedure, here is the formal template:

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for personal attacks (more of the same). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

El_C 11:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

Juan M.S. Arteaga, please desist immediately from sending me emails. If you continue to do so, your Wikipedia email function will also be disabled. El_C 15:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Juan_M.S._Arteaga&oldid=977234190"