User talk:Julnicolas

Chemtoolbox Article.[edit]

Hi Julnicolas, I think that you created this article so many times and so quickly that you probably didn't have time to become acquainted with the inclusion standards for English Wikipedia articles. Below are some links that I think you would find helpful with the ones or particular note boldfaced

In particular here it is always a bad idea for someone to write an article either about themselves; notable things are eventually written about by someone else. For this subject (chemtoolbox) to stay here as an article it requires verifiability to reliable sources that are independent from yourself and the software. Mentions in trade journals, news articles, awards and the like are what is required. I do note that, at least through google, there are no news, books, scholarly article links. I can also see that once I eliminate Wikipedia mirrors, press releases, blog hits, download links and other things that are not reliable sources, there is nothing left. If noone independant has written significant amounts about the software then there is simply no possibility of an English Wikipedia article being kept.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly, or you can drop a further note on my talk page - Peripitus (Talk) 23:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]