User talk:Justbecause5

Ask me anything here please.

January 2015

There appears to have been an attempt to give undue weight to this source. Adding the same source to multiple articles can be seen as a form of WP:SPAM, so it is best to avoid this.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 15:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm rather offended that I would be dubbed as a spammer when I'm an editor and admin on various wikias but I understand your concern so I will refrain from adding any sources from there for now.Justbecause5 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry for accusing you of spamming if this was unintentional. The real problem with this source, as User:Betty Logan pointed out, is that it is a collection of soundbite quotes rather than the full text of the review. It would be better to find the full text of the reviews, for example Stephen Hunter's review of 2001 is in the Washington Post here.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Alright, when I find the full reviews, I'll post the links for them then.Justbecause5 (talk) 06:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Good Day to Die Hard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't know how to fix that.--Justbecause5 (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Die Hard scenario films

Category:Die Hard scenario films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hitman: Agent 47, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

I'll correct it.--Justbecause5 (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Forest Whitaker may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the late [[Bruce Lee]] and has trained actors such as [[Denzel Washington]], [[Brandon Lee]] and [[.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up and sorry for the mess; fixed it just now.Justbecause5 (talk) 21:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony Daniels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenny Baker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Anthony Daniels and WP:SYNTH

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Anthony Daniels, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 12:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Incidentally, there is a similar problem with your recent edit to Scarlett Johansson. Only one of the four sources you cite actually supports your claim, but that source (not to mention two others) is not reliable. I note that the material has already been removed by another editor, who suggested that it be reinserted elsewhere in the article. I strongly advise you not to reinsert it anywhere.

Your edits to Renny Harlin and Hayden Christensen are also disruptive and have been removed by other users. Please familiarize yourself with WP:SYNTH and especially WP:BLP! If you continue to post this sort of material, you will find your account blocked. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Then it would be best to do this for all pages as several filmmakers and actors pages including Roland Emmerich, Brett Ratner, Roger Christian, Michael Bay and more have notoriously non-neutral points of views. I was following in their footsteps because I thought it was fair game to include common interpretations made by society regardless of it being opinions. And there really isn't a way to cite it without it being an opinion as any source agreed upon or not is citing it's respective opinion. How were the edits to the latter two disruptive? Justbecause5 (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

They were disruptive for the same reasons your edits to Anthony Daniels and Scarlett Johansson were. (Whoever reverted the Renny Harlin edit put it more succinctly in their edit summary: "poorly sourced, unencyclopedic or misplaced".) Of course, I assume you didn't intend for them to be disruptive, and you're more than welcome to continue contributing here. I agree that any other biographical articles with non-neutral points of view should also be fixed. If you're confident that you now understand the WP:NPOV policy, as well as WP:OR and WP:RS, then you're welcome to fix any problems yourself. If individual cases are unclear, it's best to open a discussion on the article's talk page to ask for advice. —Psychonaut (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I think this would be an appropriate link to add to this person's respective page.Justbecause5 (talk) 03:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I'll bring it up on the talk pages then.Justbecause5 (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Recent later 2000s, early 2010s picture of Joe Estevez.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Recent later 2000s, early 2010s picture of Joe Estevez.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm not expert on this new system so I would just need to simply know how to change whatever it was marked under and which would be fair use. I don't know how to use any of these methods so this means nothing to me.Justbecause5 (talk) 20:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Yoshio Tsuchiya appearing in Destroy All Monsters!.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yoshio Tsuchiya appearing in Destroy All Monsters!.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Justbecause5. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, I'm JesseRafe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Twin films without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't indiscriminately remove information from articles. Especially when it is well-cited, and especially if that information is obviously important such as the article's lede/introduction. JesseRafe (talk) 21:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Last I checked, I added back in content that interfered with one of my edits and didn't change anything else. It was because somehow I didn't save while I was posting it and had to go back. No, I don't remove any information unless it's from a biased or incited paper like Fox News/MSNBC.Justbecause5 (talk) 21:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

You did. It's in the history, it's clear and incontrovertible. Please read the MOS and learn how to cite. Stop citing to Wikipedia itself and stop linking to WP articles as if they were external. These "sources" are not reliable, they're just blogs and fan sites. JesseRafe (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Not true, they were cited from actual newspaper, articles and books covering the history of film. Wikipedia pages when cited also had relevant information. I didn't cover many fan sites and once again the whole page is based on movies with similar plots or circumstances that came out around the same time.Justbecause5 (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

You have no credibility here, what the heck does "not true" mean??? You are citing Wikipedia articles like external websites, that is not OK. Please read the MOS and learn how to cite appropriately. Take your positions to the Talk Page, Speed 2 and Titantic have nothing to do with each other, unlike say two movies about Wyatt Earp or Prefontaine or Yves Saint Laurent or Truman Capote, etc etc -- exact same premises for films, not random crap that are tangentially related "they both have a ship in them", that is not twin film and seriously undermines the credibility of this page. Stop now. JesseRafe (talk) 03:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Virtually every source sited is external. The various news sites were no different than Variety or whatever sources are quoted in the reception or details on a typical Wikipedia film page. One example which you disagree with doesn't mean someone lacks credibility and you clearly did not read ALL of the sources. You're supposed to bring a problem to the Talk page before removing it regardless as opposed to continually doing edit warring. We are allowed to quote other wikipedia pages. The credibility is continually hurt by your vague opinions and continually removing sources without saying why they are inaccurate.Justbecause5 (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Are you kidding? You cited using ref tags to Wikipedia again and again! This is in the article's history, don't say it didn't happen. Just the same as you removed valid sources and entire sections, including the introduction. This isn't about your opinion, but about consensus. Per WP:BRD the onus is on you to go to the article's talk page and build consensus there, not me. Please read the MOS about how to cite and reliable sources in the meantime as well. JesseRafe (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "User continually edit warring vital sources.". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 24 May 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning User continually edit warring vital sources., to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Thanks for nothing.Justbecause5 (talk) 21:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Justbecause5. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Hope the holidays were fun!Justbecause5 (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Justbecause5. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Prophecy films

A tag has been placed on Category:The Prophecy films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Warlock films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Warlock films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Boa Python films has been nominated for merging

Category:Boa Python films, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Deep Blue Sea films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Deep Blue Sea films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 16:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Angel films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Angel films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 09:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Shanghai films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Shanghai films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Backdraft films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Backdraft films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Blade Runner films has been nominated for merging

Category:Blade Runner films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Best of the Best films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Best of the Best films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:47, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Red films has been nominated for merging

Category:Red films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sin City films has been nominated for merging

Category:Sin City films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sicario films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Sicario films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:CyberTracker films has been nominated for deletion

Category:CyberTracker films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cyborg Nemesis films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Cyborg Nemesis films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Olympus Has Fallen films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Olympus Has Fallen films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Undisputed films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Undisputed films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Zombieland films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Zombieland films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Timecop films has been nominated for merging

Category:Timecop films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Young Guns films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Young Guns films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Moontrap flms has been nominated for deletion

Category:Moontrap flms has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 06:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:The Equalizer films has been nominated for renaming

Category:The Equalizer films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Tom-Yum-Goong films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Tom-Yum-Goong films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:The Foreigner films has been nominated for deletion

Category:The Foreigner films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Prison on Fire films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Prison on Fire films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Dinocroc Supergator films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Dinocroc Supergator films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Elite Squad films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Elite Squad films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Now You See Me films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Now You See Me films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Maleficent films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Maleficent films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:No Contest films has been nominated for deletion

Category:No Contest films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:SWAT films has been nominated for renaming

Category:SWAT films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Dead or Alive films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Dead or Alive films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bronx Warrior films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Bronx Warrior films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Boondocks Saints films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Boondocks Saints films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Jarhead films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Jarhead films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Jack Reacher films has been nominated for merging

Category:Jack Reacher films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Rich and Famous films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Rich and Famous films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:In the Heat of the Night films has been nominated for renaming

Category:In the Heat of the Night films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Speed films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Speed films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 07:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:The Circuit films has been nominated for renaming

Category:The Circuit films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 10:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Street Fighter (1970s series) films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Street Fighter (1970s series) films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 22:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Conan films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Conan films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 15:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers 07:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Circuit (film series)

A tag has been placed on Category:The Circuit (film series) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Categories

Please don't add articles to inappropriate categories. See Wikipedia:Categorization for guidance. DrKay (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Special:Contributions/97.99.154.108 while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding inappropriate categories. It is disruptive to continue with a series of edits after being asked to stop. DrKay (talk) 21:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC) Nothing inappropriate or unconstructive to anything. Please specify.Justbecause5 (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DrKay (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justbecause5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Citing an actual universe, no rule got broken.Justbecause5 (talk) 02:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Without getting into the weeds of what is and is not canon for a particular universe(personally I think the assumptions a filmmaker is operating under doesn't necessarily contribute to canon, but that's not for me to determine, nor do I do so here) your editing was disruptive and this request doesn't tell me what you will do to avoid being disruptive in the future, so I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello @DrKay:, I don't know if it is my place to get involved here, but I have experience with this editor and I do not believe they necessarily made recent edits in an attempt to vandalise. I believe they added recent categories to articles due to a naive assumption about a so called "shared universe" based around Val Verde (fictional country).★Trekker (talk) 21:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

There's nothing to complain about. It's not fan-made or meta if the filmmakers, comic book writers and studios have confirmed it. Ridley Scott noted how Blade Runner & Alien were connected; Steven E. De Souza & Joel Silver films used the same characters, locations (Val Verde) and De Souza has said in several recent interviews that they're all in the same universe. The Speed connection is them using the same truck companies as Die Hard. You can disagree but you can't argue with creators of these films.Justbecause5 (talk) 01:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Rights holding define franchises and continuity, not writers or directors.★Trekker (talk) 10:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm not inclined to unblock on the basis of these comments. I don't see how Blade Runner is part of the Speed film franchise and I would be surprised if any reliable sources make such a claim. DrKay (talk) 16:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

@DrKay: I agree no reliable sources makes such claims, but my point is that I dont think Justbecause5 made these edits in an attempt to vandalise, I think he just lacks understanding of how franchises and how Wikipedia categorization of them is supposed to work.★Trekker (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

I"m still here guys, I understand perfectly as once again the filmmakers acknowledged it is one connected universe.

Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 And once again, rights owners get a legal say but as a neutral source, Wikipedia doesn't comment on what is or isn't considered canon, let alone gatekeep or say the creators are wrong. For instance, Tom Fontana and other TV creators had deliberately made many shows be part of their St. Elsewhere/Law & Order shows. They knew rights owners might take issue with it but it didn't stop them from making it official in their eyes or stating such in interviews. Justbecause5 (talk) 02:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

In other words, the android company in Blade Runner is part of the same evil corporation in the Alien films.

Alien crossed over with Predator. Predator film, games & comics are set in Val Verde country which connects Die Hard 2, Commando & other de Souza shows. He had the reporter from Die Hard appear in Ricochet and, again, Speed is connected because of same trucks in Die Hard 1 & 3.Justbecause5 (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)