User talk:Justine Msechu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fan art images in lead sections / infoboxes[edit]

Dear Justine Msechu, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia.

However, the Middle-earth WikiProject does not use fan art or low-quality photographs in its lead sections or infoboxes to head up its articles. The articles are based on J. R. R. Tolkien's books and scholarly criticism of them, with additional information about films, games and so on related to the books. Artwork is required to be of suitable quality. I have therefore reverted some of your edits.

All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chiswick Chap thank you for the information can i get the information about how to choose the good quality picture?.
regards, --Justine Msechu (talk) 09:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boromir. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding fan art images to Middle-earth articles, these are not of suitable quality for the WikiProject. All your edits are reverted. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative accounts[edit]

Is this you? User:Aminwa 21? --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 13:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this also you? User:Lilianfeliz? --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SPI[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aminwa 21. Thank you. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Justine Msechu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i use my account only in my laptop and phone i dont know why you guys atack me? if there is any reason make it clear if not unblock me Justine Msechu (talk) 18:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked per the below discussion with the blocking admin. I strongly advise that you and your fellow WPWPARK editors slow way down with adding images and engage with other editors when reverted - you aren't sockpuppets, but that doesn't prevent you from just getting blocked for being disruptive. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, recommend unblock here (and on the other CU-blocked WPWP folks) - WPWP has plenty of issues, but I don't think this is socking. Per the AN/I discussion, I think this is multiple people meeting up, like an editathon, and the prize structure doesn't seem to encourage socking (block evasion, maybe, but not socking). GeneralNotability (talk) 23:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralNotability, you have the same powers I do, and you have my blessing. BTW, Justine Msechu's response is both impolite and not exactly to the point: it's not about the laptop, it's about the room, the building, the network that this laptop is plugged into. What they might could explain is how, on July 24, they were on the exact same IP address as Janeth Mosha, Edward Jacobo, Collysoka, and Innocent Massawe. Justine and Innocent logged off at the same time that day. Plus, there's the warnings you saw above, on this talk page, and the edits they made that were reverted by Future Perfect. So besides the socking, there's competence, and NOTHERE. Again, please unblock if you see fit. Drmies (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Drmies, well, I don't quite - this is a CU block, which is why I asked. There's absolutely issues with their editing, but the balance of evidence convinces me that this is a CIR editathon-type thing, which at the very least doesn't need a CU block. Will unblock with a very strong warning. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing, GeneralNotability--it's all good. I don't think there's a need for a warning, extra strong or not; they either get it or they don't. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November![edit]

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

AfroCine: 2021 Months of African Cinema Contest Winners[edit]

Greetings!

After successfully completing the 2021 Months of African Cinema Global Contest on 30 November 2021, we are happy to announce the winners in the contest!

Over 4,000 articles were created across 17 language Wikipedias, surpassing all expectations and placing the contest firmly as one of the most successful article-writing contests on Wikipedia. A big thank you to you and every single person who created articles during the period of the contest for making this happen!

All our winners have now been announced and you can check the complete list here. We'd still be contacting everyone who has won something separately to send over their prizes. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! –Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Justine_Msechu&oldid=1084502387"