User talk:Kaizen the Great

This is Kaizen the Great's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zowey Rens (June 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Amazon and press releases are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zowey Rens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zowey Rens, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaizen the Great! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zowey Rens has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zowey Rens. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for the feedback. I see some Wikipedia pages which have Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Tiktok on their reference list. If I put those sites on my reference list through using WayBack machine, will the page still get rejected, considering that there are some who use those on their reference list but still got accepted? Thank you. Kaizen the Great (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See other crap articles exist Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Tiktok are NOT reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 09:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know they aren't, that's why I was confused on why some Wikipedia pages got accepted even though they have those unreliable sources on their reference list. Kaizen the Great (talk) 09:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification:CLathrop202020 corrected and resubmitted![edit]

@Kaizen the GreatI have edited The Draft:Zowey Rens and resubmitted it. If there are any problems, post it on my talk page.Your CLathrop202020 (talk) 13:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Kaizen the Great. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Zowey Rens, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the feedback, but I don't have any external relationship with the person mentioned on the page. I only see her posts in promotional pages and found out that a lot of articles have been written about her, that's why I've decided to write about her. Aside from her, I'm also planning to write an article about other international Filipino Wattpad writers just like Neilani Alejandrino, but I'll write about her soon once the issues for this article are solved. Thank you! Kaizen the Great (talk) 13:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything I can do to improve the Draft:Zowey Rens - Wikipedia ? Thank you. Kaizen the Great (talk) 13:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was just going to reply, saying that the sources are insufficient to establish notability, and the whole thing is written in a very promotional tone. But then I saw that you resubmitted the draft, so now I've said that in my decline comments instead. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the feedbacks. I contested the nomination. Kaizen the Great (talk) 13:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zowey Rens (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources cited do not establish notability per WP:GNG, and there is nothing here to suggest WP:AUTHOR notability either. The tone of the draft is highly promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zowey Rens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zowey Rens[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zowey Rens, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]