User talk:Kamododragoon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kamododragoon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Organisation Intersex International[edit]

Thanks for your recent contributions at Organisation Intersex International. I reverted them because they contained original research, and any claims, especially controversial ones, need to be sourced from a reliable source. If you have published references that meet these standards, you are welcome to add the statements back. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Can you explain why you keep adding Kallmann syndrome to the page on Intersexuality, given that it's not a recognized intersex condition? We're discussing it on the talk page right now, so maybe you could weigh in there? - Alison 03:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simple, because DSD, which is Disorders of Sexual development considers and list Kallmann's Syndrome as an intersex condition and it is considered intersex by Accord Alliance.

Intersex page[edit]

Hi, this is a warning that your repeated insertions about Kallman's without any verifiable sources are close to edit warring. You would be better engaging in the discussion about this on the talk page. Mish (talk) 01:00, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing Kallmann's Syndrome from the Intersex list because what you are doing is erasing another intersex condition and erasing another group from the intersex community. The more you erase, the more I will keep adding Kallmann's syndrome to the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamododragoon (talkcontribs)
It is advisable to sign your posts. As well as drawing your attention to your continuing to edit war to get unverifed information into the article, and having threatened me if I do not allow this, you are now being uncivil, and in your comments you fail to WP:AGF. Further behaviour like this and I will have to report you. See the discussion page for a fuller response.Mish (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Intersex. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. UtherSRG (talk) 20:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not this *again* :/ You've already been blocked for edit-warring on intersex for inserting KS. Please provide valid scientific references for your claim. This one is not good enough because it never addresses any IS claims - Alison 18:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]