User talk:Kanbanize

In response to your feedback[edit]

This is a pretty common concern with new editors. try looking at this tutorial maybe it can help you a bit. good luck

Ryan shell (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kanbanize (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The page intention is not to commercialize the product but simply to inform the audience about it. In that point I don't quite see the reason for the block. I don't see why forming the article that way is a problem although it is not for Kanban Tool and Trello . Our audience is very uninformed of this new wave of management tools and our goal is only to inform them. Please can you give me a feedback about hot the text should be rewrote so it suit the Wikipedia policy. Thank you in advance.

Decline reason:

You are blocked because your chosen username is intrinsically promotional; it is an absolute requirement that you first apply for an unblock for username change, using {{unblock-un}}. If you then wish to create an article you will need to be aware of WP:COI, WP:COMPANY and WP:NN policies.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:43, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kanbanize (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new NikolayTod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The article I was going to post was with the same name as my username. That become a reason for my block.

Decline reason:

I have looked at the page you created. If you sincerely did not perceive it as promotion, then you are so unable to see your own writing objectively that you will not be able to write with the detached, neutral way that is required for a Wikipedia article. It is also clear that you have a conflict of interest (apart from anything else, you use of the word "our" indicates an involvement) and you have given no indication that you intend to do anything other than write about your product. Have you read the instructions in the block notice headed "What can I do now?" JamesBWatson (talk) 20:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've just looked at the deleted draft, and would advise you to real WP:GNG and WP:RS. I could see no indication that the product has the notability required for an article, and all the references failed RS - reliable independent sources. Even if you'd had a different name, the article wouldn't have made it in article space. Remember that this is an encyclopaedia, not a directory. Not everything gets an article. Peridon (talk) 13:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]