User talk:Kanmi1

This user is a student editor in North_Carolina_Central_University/Artificial_Intelligence_and_Law_(Fall_2023) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kanmi1, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Toupo Delima[edit]

Hi @Kanmi1, My name is Brianda, and I am the Wikipedia Expert for your class. I checked out your contributions and saw that you haven't quite started the project yet (at least on Wikipedia). The first step is to gather reliable sources on your topic to build out your bibliography. If you need any help getting started, please feel free to reach out to me, just remember to ping me. Looping in @9Starbucks. Brianda (Wiki Ed) Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Brianda,

I have published a bibliography for danielle toupo delima and requested for it to be reviewed from my sandbox.

I hope you can see it. Thanks Kanmi1 (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kanmi1 Are you referencing the contribution that was put through the Articles for creation process? I took a look at the draft, and like the editor mentioned below, the contribution doesn't have citations to reliable, secondary sources independent of the topic. You need at least 3 - 5 reliable sources that are focused on the topic, in this case Danielle. They could be newspaper articles from a reputable source, or an article from an academic journal. When creating a new article, it has to be clear that the topic satisfies the notability requirements in order for the article to exist on Wikipedia. You establish notability through the 3 - 5 reliable sources that demonstrate the topic (Danielle) has received significant coverage. At this time, the draft is missing those reliable sources to establish notability. Check out this training module on examples of reliable sources to look for as you build your list of sources. Let me know if you have any questions. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danielle Toupo Delima (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danielle Toupo Delima and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 20:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kanmi1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 20:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Danielle Toupo Delima[edit]

Hello, Kanmi1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danielle Toupo Delima, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]