User talk:Kattadchamarsofworld

December 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change sourced content and sources. And do not keep adding protection templates . Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf^(talk) 12:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you do not understand Wikipedia's meaning of reliable sources. Your so called 'proofs' do not mean anything here, unless they are properly sourced. If you have any questions about how Wikipedia works, please ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf^(talk) 12:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalizing Sangat Singh Minhas article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If that's so, you should give reliable and tested information. Guru Ravidass Ji was never ever any kind of so called Hindu

Kattadchamarsofworld (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 09:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Again stop vandalizing the article. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:04, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Akhiljaxxn. I noticed that you recently removed content from B. R. Ambedkar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you are not interested or able to discuss issues with users in the article's Talk Pages as required, instead of continuously changing articles to your liking without referencing, and deleting whole sections without a proper explanation. This leads to another block, to give you time to read our policies. If you continue this behavior after the temporary block automatically lifts in a few days, without discussing your issues, you might be blocked from editing again, maybe indefinitely. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not to push your point of view. -- Alexf^(talk) 09:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 09:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Stop this vandalism. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Ravidas.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Newslinger talk 10:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]