User talk:Keimzelle/Archives/2020/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Terri Schiavo
Aloha. Can you point me in the general direction of the content that was removed from Terri Schiavo? If you take a look at the history, you'll find the version which contains the content you want to add back into the article. --Viriditas | Talk 09:47, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've added most of it back in. If you have any further suggestions, let me know, or just edit the page. --Viriditas | Talk 19:24, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I've noticed you've interacted with Mlorrey on a few pages. I've filed a request for comment against him and I was hoping you would certify the dispute. Thanks very much, Meelar (talk) 21:26, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
== Eine seltsame Anfrage... ==
Hallo Marcika,
eine Kollegin von mir sucht die Adresse einer ungarischen Kollegin, und eben... sie weiss ihren exakten Namen nicht mehr - und so findet sie auf www.matav.hu ihre Budapester Adresse auch nicht. Kennst du vielleicht die "richtige" Schreibweise vom Familiennamen "Hustiesz"? :-)
Machs gut und lieber Gruss, --Keimzelle 08:00, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Ich kenne sie leider nicht - der Name klingt keinem der häufigeren ungarischen Familiennamen ähnlich. Ich habe einige plausible Varianten (Húsztíz, Húsztísz, Hústísz, Hústíz...) bei matav.hu ausprobiert, habe aber leider auch nichts gefunden. Sorry. -- Marcika 09:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Caffeine and Sleep
Thank you for your addition to the main sleep page. However, is there any way you could provide a link to an article in english with regard to your information about sleep in the elderly? Making a claim on an english version of wiki and then providing the evidence for the claim in another language does not fit the guidelines of Wikipedia. Because it is in german, most of the readers will not be able to discern if the source is reputable/factual (a peer reviewed scientific journal), or someone's opinion (blog).
While not used in hospitals in the United States, it seems it is commonly used in Germany and Switzerland.
Please give a peer-reviewed verifiable source fot this statement. The one referred to (in German) seems to be a personal opinion, i.e., without any reference. Jclerman 17:34, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Lost in translation
- On 13 October 2005, user 80.129.140.252 has indicated in an edit to the sleep article: "(→Notes - 'german 'RR' is Riva-Rocci (method of measuring blood pressure, used as synonym with blood pressure, not respiratory resistance!))'". See result of a web search in the discussion page of the sleep article. Jclerman 02:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Swiss vs Swissair
Thanks for noticing my mistake and reverting back to the correct image. I didn't notice the difference :) I was in switzerland for 10 days starting on september 23rd.. wonderful country. sikander 22:21, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Procrastination article
I need your help on the talk page for the procrastination article. Some guy (pianoman) is trying to pull in a mediator in order to remove your expectancy value theory section, along with most of my contributions. Help! Go for it! 10:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I hate it when people remove things I wrote... and I don't even get a discussion about the merits of trimming the "theories" section. It's just deleted... What should I do? Is a mediator a danger for our article version? Or do the actions of a mediator just put a stop to pianoman's intentions? --Keimzelle 09:48, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
A mediator is called in when there's a tie, usually in a one-on-one dispute, inorder to break the tie and thereby "reach a consensus". If you come and join the discussion, then it will no longer be one-on-one, which will remove the need for a mediator (I think). So, all you need to do is answer the posts on talk:procrastination and express your opinion. Almost everything on Wikipedia is done by consensus, following whatever the majority decides. Go for it! 18:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Procrastination article is now in imminent danger
I don't think you understood my previous request. You need to make your vote known on Talk:Procrastination. Pianoman has recruited another user to side with him, so now it is 2 vs 1 (them vs me). You didn't make your desires known, so you aren't currently being counted in the dispute. They have voted for Transwiki'ing the article off of Wikipedia. If you don't want that to happen, you need to go to the talk page right away and let them know loud and clear. Go for it! 13:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm thinking about going for adminship, and seek your advice
Hi Keimzelle,
I'm thinking about requesting adminship, and have written a draft of my request. I would appreciate it if you would proofread it for me, and let me know what you think. (Thanks for your help on the procrastination article). --Go for it! 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Voting in Switzerland
Hi, you asked for someone to check your language in the voting Switzerland article. I edited and fixed some typos and made some suggestions. Overall great article. Hope you find my edits usefulHdstubbs 05:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Now I feel bad about ticking off an experienced editor :-). I concur with Hdstubbs, very interesting article. --Malthusian (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Stratcon
Yes, I have a copy. I think you can still buy it from Delta Tao.[1] Brainhell 20:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I hope they have 3.0 too. Or try eBay. I like the artillary and helicopter units in 4.0 because they help clear out those annoying fleets. But 3.0 has a better look and feel. Brainhell 18:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
I downloaded 2.0 from the new link to the StratCon page. One MAJOR advantage in 3.0 is the ability to use the keypad to move units, not just the mouse. 4.0 doesn't have a better AI. It's true that it's less crip visually. But the helicopters are very effective against ground units, anf conserving them adds a challenge. Plus, using artillery to blaast the computer's fleets is satisfying. Brainhell 17:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Notice
The Community Portal was recently reverted to a version that appeared months ago. Therefore, I've called for a vote to restore to the Community Portal the version that had developed there up until that reversion. There are three drafts competing for the privilege, each representing entirely different approaches, including the current revert version. To show your support for which design should be displayed as the Community Portal, VOTE HERE. Sincerely, --Go for it! 18:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Xanadu
Hi, I've just reverted your edit to Xanadu - the Citizen Kave stuff is one of the (many) entries on the dabpage: Xanadu (disambiguation). Thanks/wangi 14:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
From Russia With Love
According to this site, the helicopter in the movie is a one-of-a-kind ("one-off"). But according to the registration number "N780ND" it is a Hiller UH-12C. (Born2flie 03:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC))
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Black Sun (Star Wars), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Black Sun (Star Wars)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Black Sun (Star Wars), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 04:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Black Sun (Star Wars)
I have nominated Black Sun (Star Wars), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sun (Star Wars). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 20:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Black Sun (Star Wars)
I have nominated Black Sun (Star Wars), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sun (Star Wars) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Ganz herzlichen Dank
- Hallo Keimzelle, ganz herzlichen Dank für Deine ausgezeichnete Übersetzungsarbeit!
- Ich bin Dir sehr, sehr dankbar!
- Möge Gott Dich segnen.!
- Falls Du deinen Lieblingsartikel gerne in das Chinesische übersetzt haben möchtest, würde ich Dir dabei gerne helfen.
Barnstar
Thankyou for your brilliant and outstanding translation effort!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your many months of service to Wikipedia, I, Jose77, hereby award you this barnstar. --Joseph, 21:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC) |
- Our church is non-denominational. The article can be found Here. --Jose77 (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Turkish Airlines Flight 1950, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Please do not add opinions and statements of fact or speculation drawn from online forum discussions. These fall far short of our guidelines for reliable sources. Taking these opinions and presenting them as preliminary findings is original research without citations from the primary sources. Mfield (talk) 22:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Alitalia Flight 404
A tag has been placed on Alitalia Flight 404 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alice (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
The article Task Coach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- the subject may not be adequately notable to justify a Wikipedia article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vectro (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Von Steuben (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Erich-Fromm-Preis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humanist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PPARGC1A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lactate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Ballot federal referendum.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rega (air rescue), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EC-135 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Keimzelle. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Data reduction and data economy, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Rockslide of Elm) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Rockslide of Elm, Keimzelle!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added the title in German (important so it's possible to find resources in that language), linked to the dewiki article and added 2 sources and 2 categories. You may want to check the death toll: the only published source I could find says 115.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Keimzelle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SBB Re481
Hello Keimzelle,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SBB Re481 for deletion in response to your request.
If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you - speedy deletion is what I intended! @Arthistorian1977: --Keimzelle (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Keimzelle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Nuitka
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Keimzelle, thanks for creating Nuitka!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There too many issues on this page. Please improve.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 02:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Keimzelle. The mass distribution of what? And where is that backed by the source? --mfb (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paburr (talk • contribs) 01:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Keimzelle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Carol Chenard moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Carol Chenard, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Karl-Heinz Rosch moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Karl-Heinz Rosch, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Draft:Carol Chenard concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Carol Chenard, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Karl-Heinz Rosch concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karl-Heinz Rosch, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Carol Chenard
Hello, Keimzelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carol Chenard".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 16:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Karl-Heinz Rosch
Hello, Keimzelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karl-Heinz Rosch".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |