User talk:Keithosmarferrer

Welcome!

Hello, Keithosmarferrer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Owl in the dollar revealed !, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Invitrovanitas (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Owl in the dollar revealed ![edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Owl in the dollar revealed !. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - United States dollar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at United States dollar - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Invitrovanitas (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keith ferrer[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Keith ferrer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. role^player 13:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Simplebotics has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/user/generalgeek314. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Simplebotics[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Simplebotics, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Simplebotics®"[edit]

A page you created, Simplebotics®, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Mifter (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to BEAM robotics constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Mifter (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SIMPLEBOTICS[edit]

The article SIMPLEBOTICS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable "company" that has 0 media coverage, and has only 1 product, which is just instructions. WP:INC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bluefist ^talk 05:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SIMPLEBOTICS for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SIMPLEBOTICS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIMPLEBOTICS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bluefist ^talk 06:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 March 19. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Seaphoto^Talk 07:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to SIMPLEBOTICS. Seaphoto^Talk 07:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keithosmarferrer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never vandalize ever again

Decline reason:

So far your only edits have been unhelpful pages, removal of deletion templates and even pure vandalism to an article. You received multiple warnings over the course of two days to stop doing so, before you eventually got blocked. Seeing the contributions you made so far, i see no indication that you intend to make quality contributions, and the 4 minute gap between the block and the unblock request does not inspire confidence that you actually thought about it.

As of such, i am declining this request. You may make future requests of course, but without some clear indication that you intend to make quality edits i wouldn't see a reason to unblock. Trying to protect a page you made i can understand - creating nonsense pages and vandalizing other article's is simply vandalism Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 10:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keithosmarferrer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im sorry, i was angry at that time and i am new to wikipedia Keithosmarferrer (talk) 11:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Thank you for your apology; we accept it wholeheartedly. Since you don't have any specific plans for making the encyclopedia better, you don't need an active account at this time, but we hope you continue to read, enjoy, and learn from Wikipedia's many articles. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maybe this will help you understand[edit]

Hi Keith,

I see that you are trying insistently to create an article for Simplebotics. The reason it keeps getting deleted is that you don’t demonstrate that Simplebotics satisfies the notability criteria at Wikipedia:Notability. You may think that Simplebotics deserves an article, but unless an article satisfies our notability standards, it is going to get deleted. If I understand correctly, Simplebotics is an up and coming idea, but Wikipedia accepts articles only for subjects that have already achieved notability by our standards.

When administrators look at an unblock request, they consider not only whether the user will stop their disruptive behavior but also whether they will now make productive contributions. If you are here only for a futile attempt to create an article for Simplebotics, I am sorry to say there is no point in your having an active account. —teb728 t c 08:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]